The document you are attempting to view belongs to a group of over 2000+ restricted divorce related documents. If you are interested in viewing this complete document and having access to the other 2000+ documents, you must establish an active Divorce Research Center account.
If you have already created an account, sign in below.
Otherwise, you will need to
Create an Account.
Document summary:
The appeals court, in reversing the trial courts refusal to modify the obligation, held that intent to commit a crime did not evince an intent to decrease income and that it would be inequitable to require the incarcerated father to pay a support obligation six times his current income.
|
|
