The document you are attempting to view belongs to a group of over 2000+ restricted divorce related documents. If you are interested in viewing this complete document and having access to the other 2000+ documents, you must establish an active Divorce Research Center account.
If you have already created an account, sign in below.
Otherwise, you will need to
Create an Account.
Document summary:
The plaintiff sought damages for the defendants affair with the plaintiffs wife. The plaintiffs cause of action was styled as one for intentional interference with a contractual relationship. The court held that this cause of action was foreclosed by the abolition of the torts of criminal conversation and alienation of affections, and the dismissal was affirmed. Atkinson v. Evans, 2001 Pa. Super. 344 (Dec. 5, 2001) http://www.courts.state.pa.us/ OpPosting/ Superior/out/a33028_01.pdf.
|
|
