The document you are attempting to view belongs to a group of over 2000+ restricted divorce related documents. If you are interested in viewing this complete document and having access to the other 2000+ documents, you must establish an active Divorce Research Center account.
If you have already created an account, sign in below.
Otherwise, you will need to
Create an Account.
Document summary:
The wife appealed the division of property, arguing that the court was obligated to consider the value of the husbands interest in certain stock options through his employer that he had not exercised but could have, as of the final hearing date on the petition for dissolution. The court distinguished the options at issue in Hann v. Hann, 655 N.E.2d 566 (Ind. Ct. App. 1995), and held that the court should have included the value in the marital estate. Henry v. Henry, No. 02A03-0106-CV-203 (Ind. Ct. App. Nov. 2001) .
|
|
