The document you are attempting to view belongs to a group of over 2000+ restricted divorce related documents. If you are interested in viewing this complete document and having access to the other 2000+ documents, you must establish an active Divorce Research Center account.
If you have already created an account, sign in below.
Otherwise, you will need to
Create an Account.
Document summary:
VIRGINIA - Shackelford v. Shackelford, 39 Va. App. 201, 571 S.E.2d 917 (2002). The price paid in a prior purchase of a 50% interest in a business was not evidence of the value for divorce purposes, because the price included a substantial control premium and was therefore greater than the fair market value.
|
|
