|
Relevance of Moral Conduct & Character in Custody Cases
The following table provides references to state statutes which are relevant to how marital conduct is considered and treated by the court when determining a child custody award. Alabama: Ala. Code 30-3-1 (1989): considers "moral character and prudence" of parents Alaska: Alaska Stat. 25.24.150(c), (d) (Michie 1996): considers "other factors" deemed pertinent; the court may consider only those facts that directly affect the well-being of the child Arizona: Ariz. Rev. Stat. Ann. 25-403 (West Supp. 1996): no consideration of morals Arkansas: Ark. Code Ann. 9-13-101 (Michie 1993): no factors listed California: Cal. Fam. Code 3011 (West 1994): no consideration of morals Colorado: Colo. Rev. Stat. 14-10-124(2) (1997): no consideration of conduct of proposed custodian that does not affect his or her relationship with the child Connecticut: Conn. Gen. Stat. Ann. 46b-56 (West 1995): considers cause of dissolution of marriage if relevant to the best interests of the child Delaware: Del. Code Ann. tit. 13, 722 (1994 & Supp. 1996): no consideration of morals District of Columbia: D.C. Code Ann. 16-914(a)(3) (1997): morals not considered Florida: Fla. Stat. Ann. 61.13(3) (West 1997): considers moral misconduct which impacts adversely on the child Georgia: Ga. Code Ann. 19-9-1 (Supp. 1997): considers "all the circumstances of the parties" Hawaii: Haw. Rev. Stat. 571-46 (1997): no factors listed Idaho: Idaho Code 32-717(5) (Supp. 1997): considers "integrity" of all individuals involved Illinois: 750 Ill. Comp. Stat. Ann. 5/602(b) (West Supp. 1997): no consideration of conduct of a parent that does not affect his or her relationship with the child Indiana: Ind. Code Ann. 31-1-11.5-21(a) (Michie 1997): morals not considered Iowa: Iowa Code Ann. 598.41(3) (West Supp. 1997): no consideration of morals Kansas: Kan. Stat. Ann. 60-1610(a) (Supp. 1996): no consideration of morals Kentucky: Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. 403.270 (Michie Supp. 1996): no consideration of conduct of a parent that does not affect his or her relationship with the child Louisiana: La. Civ. Code Ann. art. 134(6) (West Supp. 1997): considers "moral fitness insofar as it affects the welfare of the child" Maine: Me. Rev. Stat. Ann. tit. 19, 752(5)(L) (West Supp. 1996): considers "all other factors having a reasonable bearing on the physical and psychological well-being of the child" Maryland: Md. Code Ann., Fam. Law 9-101 (1991): no consideration of morals Massachusetts: Mass. Gen. Laws Ann. ch. 208, 31 (West Supp. 1997): considers whether the child’s living conditions adversely affect the child’s morals Michigan: Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. 722.23(3)(f) (West 1993 & Supp. 1997); Mich. Stat. Ann. 25.312(3)(f) (Law. Co-op. 1992 & Supp. 1997): considers moral fitness of the parties involved Minnesota: Minn. Stat. Ann. 518.17(1)(b) (West Supp. 1997): no consideration of conduct of proposed custodian that does not affect his or her relationship to the child Mississippi: Miss. Code Ann. 93-5-23 (Supp. 1997): no factors listed Missouri: Mo. Ann. Stat. 452.375 (West 1997): no consideration of morals Montana: Mont. Code Ann. 40-4-212(1) (1995): no consideration of morals Nebraska: Neb. Rev. Stat. 42-364(2) (Supp. 1996): no consideration of morals Nevada: Nev. Rev. Stat. Ann. 125.480(4) (Michie Supp. 1995): no consideration of morals New Hampshire: N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. 458.17 (1992 & Supp. 1996): no factors listed New Jersey: N.J. Stat. Ann. 2A:34-23 (West Supp. 1997): no factors listed New Mexico: N.M. Stat. Ann. 40-4-9 (Michie 1994): no consideration of morals New York: N.Y. Dom. Rel. Law 240(1) (McKinney Supp. 1997): no factors listed North Carolina: N.C. Gen. Stat. 50-13.2 (Supp. 1996): considers "all relevant factors" North Dakota: N.D. Cent. Code 14-09-06.2(1)(f) (Supp. 1997): considers moral fitness of parents Ohio: Ohio Rev. Code Ann. 3109.04(B) (Anderson 1996): morals not considered Oklahoma: Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 43, 112 (West Supp. 1997): no consideration of morals Oregon: Or. Rev. Stat. 107.137 (1990): no consideration of morals Pennsylvania: 23 Pa. Cons. Stat. Ann. 5303 (West 1991 & Supp. 1997): no consideration of morals Rhode Island: R.I. Gen. Laws 15-5-16(d) (1996): no factors listed South Carolina: S.C. Code Ann. 20-3-160 (Law. Co-op. 1985): considers "spiritual" interests of children South Dakota: S.D. Codified Laws Ann. 25-5-7.1 (Michie 1992): no factors listed Tennessee: Tenn. Code Ann. 36-6-101 (1996): no factors listed Texas: Tex. Fam. Code Ann. 153.002 (West 1995): no factors listed Utah: Utah Code Ann. 30-3-10(1) (Supp. 1997): considers "past conduct and moral standards of each party" Vermont: Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 15, 665(b) (1989 & Supp. 1996): no consideration of morals Virginia: Va. Code Ann. 20-107.2 (Michie Supp. 1997): no factors listed Washington: Wash. Rev. Code Ann. 26.09.190 (West 1997): no consideration of conduct of a proposed guardian that does not affect the welfare of the child West Virginia: W. Va. Code 48-2-15(b)(1) (1996): no factors listed Wisconsin: Wis. Stat. 767.24(5) (1993 & Supp. 1997): considers such other factors as the court determines are relevant Wyoming: Wyo. Stat. Ann. 20-2-113 (Michie 1997): no factors listed © 1997 National Legal Research Group, Inc.
COMMUNITY PROPERTY – Community property states treat all income or property that was acquired during the marriage, with the exception of gifts or inheritances, as belonging to both partners. Each spouse has an undivided one half interest in the whole asset, regardless of whose name is on the title. The nine community property states are Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin.
|
Easily Connect With a Lawyer or Mediator
Have Divorce Professionals from Your Area Contact You!
Need to Know the Law?
This section will provide you with the state divorce laws addressing the following issues, but not limited to; Residency Requirements, Grounds for Divorce or Dissolution of Marriage, Legal Separation, Property Division, Child Custody, Child Support, Visitation, and Spousal Support or Alimony.
|
View DIY Divorce Resources in Our Online Bookstore
|
Your Right to Child Custody, Visitation & Support Cover Price: $ Your Price: $17.95 You Save: $7.00 "A Plain English Guide to Protecting Your Children" Author: Mary L. Boland, Attorney at Law
|
| The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. This website is not a substitute for a lawyer and a lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions. |

This section will provide you with the state divorce laws addressing the following issues, but not limited to; Residency Requirements, Grounds for Divorce or Dissolution of Marriage, Legal Separation, Property Division, Child Custody, Child Support, Visitation, and Spousal Support or Alimony.



