New Jersey Info
New Jersey Divorce Start Your Divorce Find Professionals New Jersey Articles Divorce Facts Divorce Grounds Residency Divorce Laws Property Division Alimony Child Custody Child Support Divorce Forms Grandparent Rights Forum New Jersey Products Divorce by County
New Jersey Articles
Agreements Attorney Relationship Custody & Visitation Child Support Collaborative Law Counseling Divorce/General Domestic Abuse Domestic Partnership Financial Planning Foreign Divorce Mediation Parenting Property Division Spousal Support
Documenting Marital Lifestyle - In Light of the Crews Alimony Decision
Last year, I wrote about New Jersey Crews decision. One of my clients had gone recently through a "Crews Hearing" regarding marital lifestyle, even though hers was a mediated case, and even though there were no contested issues. It appeared inevitable that the court was going to require lifestyle documentation where alimony was appropriate, even when alimony was waived, and that the court felt that lifestyle documentation was equally important in uncontested cases.
As a result of the Crews decision, attorney and mediator, Suzanne Jorgensen (Brick, NJ) and I spearheaded an effort by New Jersey Association of Professional Mediators (NJAPM) to provide our membership with some guidance in their efforts to document marital standard of living in the memoranda of understanding (MOU). These recommendations are included below, and may also be useful to attorneys and pro se litigants.
My primary concern regarding Crews was its implications for mediated settlements. One of the primary principles for mediators is the concept of self-determination: clients have the right to make their own decisions. In reading the Crews case, it seemed possible that the court may start questioning mediated spousal support settlements. I am relieved to report that although they are asking for documentation regarding lifestyle, they do not appear to be imposing decisions in these uncontested cases.
The NJAPM recommendations are a work in progress, and I will update the article if any additional changes are made. I am finding that the attorneys I work with are using the descriptions and exhibits, verbatim from the MOU, and the courts are currently finding this documentation sufficient.
New Jersey Association of Professional Mediators (NJAPM)Recommendations for Drafting Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) in Light of The Crews Decision
Version 3.1; Prepared on August 31, 2000; Revised on January 18, 2001
On May 31, 2000, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled on a request for a change in rehabilitative alimony in the case of Robert B. Crews vs. Barbara D. Crews (A-20-99), by stating that the parties must go back and establish the marital standard of living experienced during the marriage. In light of the Crews decision, the New Jersey Association of Professional Mediators (NJAPM), the leading statewide mediation organization, has prepared the following recommendations for its membership regarding the drafting of MOU.
By definition, the MOU is not a legal document, but is prepared by the mediator to summarize the agreements reached in mediation by the parties. Mediators recommend that each party to the mediation have the MOU reviewed by their separate attorney. In the case of a divorcing couple, one of the attorneys will then draft the final settlement agreement based on the MOU, which is subject to review by the other attorney.
In any case in which alimony is appropriate, even where alimony is waived, the mediator should include in the MOU facts, which establish the statutory factors for alimony according to N.J.S. 2A:34-23 (b). For convenience, these are listed at the conclusion of this document.
In Crews, the Supreme Court reiterated the importance of courts establishing findings as to the standard of living during the marriage, one of the statutory factors. The marital standard of living is the "touchstone" for the initial level of alimony and for reviewing any later motions for modification based on changed circumstances. The Court noted that these findings are "equally important" in uncontested cases.
The following are some recommendations for mediators in attempting to quantify and describe the marital standard of living in memoranda of understanding (MOU):
In addition to the marital CIS, ask the parties to describe in their own words various aspects of their marital lifestyle that may include a description of the following items. Attach the parties' narrative description of the marital lifestyle to the MOU.
Ask the parties, and state in the MOU, whether the spousal and child support agreed upon will enable both of the parties to live in a manner reasonably comparable to the standard of living they enjoyed during the marriage. The MOU should specifically state if they agree that they are not currently able to maintain a standard of living reasonably comparable to the marital lifestyle. It is recommended that separate budgets that show each parties income and expenses for their separate households going forward be prepared to support these assertions.
Additionally, the Crews case indicated that if the original spousal support is not consistent with the standard of living established during the marriage but that is all the paying spouse can afford at the time, then there should be some provisions to modify the award upwards when the paying spouse's financial condition improves. Therefore, based on the statutory factors in establishing the level of support, the MOU may also need to make provisions for an upward modification of support.
Statutory Factors for Spousal Support (Alimony) according to N.J.S. 2A:34-23 (b):
To file for divorce in New Jersey under no-fault grounds, the couple must have been living separate and apart in different residences for at least 18 consecutive months. There must be no hope of reconciliation in the marriage.
Easily Connect With a Lawyer or Mediator
Have Divorce Professionals from Your Area Contact You!
|Your Right to Child Custody, Visitation & Support
Cover Price: $
Your Price: $17.95
You Save: $7.00
"A Plain English Guide to Protecting Your Children"
Author: Mary L. Boland, Attorney at Law
|The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. This website is not a substitute for a lawyer and a lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions.|