New Jersey Info
New Jersey Divorce Start Your Divorce Find Professionals New Jersey Articles Divorce Facts Divorce Grounds Residency Divorce Laws Property Division Alimony Child Custody Child Support Divorce Forms Grandparent Rights Forum New Jersey Products Divorce by County
New Jersey Articles
Agreements Attorney Relationship Custody & Visitation Child Support Collaborative Law Counseling Divorce/General Domestic Abuse Domestic Partnership Financial Planning Foreign Divorce Mediation Parenting Property Division Spousal Support
Does "Income Averaging" Work When Determining an Alimony Award?
I am a stock broker and I was recently divorced…
At the divorce trial, the judge averaged my yearly income and then used the mean average to set a ridiculously high alimony award. Two years later, my yearly income has been slashed in half. Is the concept of income average a fair and reasonable way to determine alimony?
Determining alimony is a very heated and debated art form. Many people lose their temple and some even pretend to faint when they are told how much alimony they will have to pay. When a court determines alimony it is faced with a very difficult task. Determining alimony is not as easy as it was in the past generations. In the past generations, a husband often had a steady job at a corporation and he earned a steady salary. Now fast forward to our generation X, companies are brought out, go under, and disappear in an instant. Moreover, companies get rid of employees "in a jiffy" just like they are a business machine such as a copier or a fax machine that no longer works. Companies don't value human resources as much as they used to. Given this scenario, the income of New Jerseyites fluctuates on a yearly basis. A stockbroker could have earned a high six figure income for most of the past decade. However, after the recent market crash many stockbrokers will be fortunate if they even approach a six-figure income.
A never ending debate is how is at what level of support is income set at to determine alimony when a person's income fluctuates.
Many judge use income averaging to determine a base level of income to determine alimony. An illustrative case is Platt v. Platt, A-1555-04T21555-04T2. Here, the defendant-wife and plaintiff-husband were married in 1980. They had two children, and they separated in November of 2001. The plaintiff also filed for divorce in 2001.
During the marriage, the husband opened up an auto repair shop called Platt's Performance Plus. At the divorce trial, the court determined that the husband earned $100,000 of annual income, and he awarded the wife $250 week in permanent alimony and child support of $123 per week. The court based this ruling on averaging the companies business over a five year period. Thereafter, the husband appealed. The main thrust of the defendant's appeal was that the judge erred in averaging his income in fixing alimony and child support. The Appellate Division upheld the family court. The Platt court held that in the circumstances of this case it was completely logical and reasonable to average the plaintiff's income over a five year period. Thus, the court held that there was no abuse of discretion in the family judge's analysis and conclusion.
In order for permanent alimony to be awarded in New Jersey, the marriage must have lasted at least 10 years and one spouse must have become economically dependent on the other. This type of alimony allows the obligee to maintain the lifestyle to which he or she has become accustomed for the duration of the obligor's lifetime (unless the obligee remarries).
Easily Connect With a Lawyer or Mediator
Have Divorce Professionals from Your Area Contact You!
|Your Right to Child Custody, Visitation & Support
Cover Price: $
Your Price: $17.95
You Save: $7.00
"A Plain English Guide to Protecting Your Children"
Author: Mary L. Boland, Attorney at Law
|The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. This website is not a substitute for a lawyer and a lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions.|