Three Roads to Take
Normally, a divorcing couple divides the family home in one of three ways: one, sell it on the market; two, a buyout of one spouse by the other; three, joint ownership with sale at a later date.
Option one, selling the house on the market, makes for a clean break. It may be ideal for couples without children who want to draw a line in the sand and start anew. In this regime, the couple sells the house, satisfies the outstanding mortgage, and divide the equity between the two of them. Couples often choose this route when they cannot agree about one party staying in the house or when there is a great deal of equity to divide. Moreover, some couples decide to sell the house because the mortgage payments would be burdensome for one spouse to make on his or her own.
Couples who go this route can exclude up to $500,000 from capital gains tax if they file a joint return for the year in which the house is sold. A spouse who files a separate return may exclude $250,000. In addition, a person must have owned the house for at least two out of five years and lived in it for two of five years.
Option two, one spouse buying out the other, means that one spouse remains in the house and pays the other one who has departed. Normally, the remaining spouse pays the departing spouse one half of the fair market value of the house.
Usually, this method requires that the house be refinanced, and this means that the remaining spouse must have adequate credit and finances to take over a mortgage on his or her own. Usually, the reason for refinancing is the payoff of the departing spouse. Refinancing also removes the name of the departing spouse from the mortgage. "The decision whether to sell or keep the house should be made as part of the overallsettlement. Consider the assets and debts you expect to obtain in the divorce settlement, your anticipated income and anticipated support you may receive (alimony or child support). Also consider the tax effects, such as the mortgage interest deduction, which may decrease your tax burden and therefore increase the amount of your income available to you. If you cannot comfortably afford housing expenses, it might be better, overall, to consider selling the house and replacing it with something more affordable," advises one divorce specialist.
Selling the house appeals to some people because it symbolically demonstrates the end of the marriage, but many realtors advise against selling now, "in a down market. Don’t just sell to get out of a bad situation. Don’t sell at the bottom," advise some. (Of course, in many places, no one knows where the bottom is.)
Since the collapse of the market, the polarity between the sellers and buyers has shifted from the former to the latter, so waiting may become very problematic for a couple eager to move forward.
Option three, joint ownership with sale at a later date, often appeals to parents with small children who wish to disrupt them as little as possible. In this routine, the house remains in both names. One spouse departs, and the remaining spouse assumes responsibility for the mortgage payments and maintenance of the house. Later, often when the children reach the age of emancipation, the house is sold and the proceeds are divided.
Each of these routes has advantages and disadvantages that must be carefully considered. Because of economic conditions, some spouses, who might want to use options one or two, now are forced to take option three. And some, according to reports, are even sharing the house during and after the divorce.
Resources & Tools
COMMUNITY PROPERTY VERSUS EQUITABLE DISTRIBUTION -- There are two basic ways to handle divorce property division: Community Property: Alaska, Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, Wisconsin and Puerto Rico are community property states. This means that all marital property is typically defined as community property or separate property. When divorcing, community property is typically divided evenly, and each spouse keeps his or her separate property. Equitable Distribution: All other states follow equitable distribution. This means that a judge decides what is equitable, or fair, rather than simply splitting the property in two. In practice, this may mean that two-thirds of the property goes to the higher earning spouse, with the other spouse getting one-third.
Easily Connect With a Lawyer or Mediator
Have Divorce Professionals from Your Area Contact You!
Divorce & Money: How to Make the Best Financial Decisions
What Happens to the Marital Home Upon Divorce
|Your Right to Child Custody, Visitation & Support
Cover Price: $
Your Price: $17.95
You Save: $7.00
"A Plain English Guide to Protecting Your Children"
Author: Mary L. Boland, Attorney at Law
|The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. This website is not a substitute for a lawyer and a lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions.|