|
|
|
Cases of Interest: Corporations
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
FLORIDA: Barineau v. Barineau, 662 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. DCA 1995).
Courts are not barred from inquiring whether a nonprofit corporation is the alter ego of a party in a dissolution proceeding for the purpose of achieving equitable distribution.
Read More About This CaseNEW YORK: Wurtzel v. Wurtzel, ___ A.D.2d ___, 642 N.Y.S.2d 967 (1996).
The husband was not entitled to broad disclosure from a company owned by the wife's father, where the wife was a mere employee of the company and did not own any interest in it, the husband had failed to first obtain discovery from the wife, and the husband had failed to establish the existence of special circumstances justifying disclosure from nonparty witnesses.
Read More About This CaseNORTH DAKOTA: Grinaker v. Grinaker, 553 N.W.2d 200 (N.D. 1996).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by appointing a receiver for the parties' business, but the wife should have sought relief in the parties' pending divorce action rather than in a separate action for equitable relief.
Read More About This CaseTEXAS: Dawson-Austin v. Austin, 920 S.W.2d 776 (Tex. Ct. App. 1996).
The law of Texas, where the husband was domiciled and had filed a divorce action, applied to determine the classification of stock purchased before marriage, rather than the law of Minnesota, where the parties were domiciled at the time of marriage.
Read More About This CaseGo to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page
| Store Categories State Guidebooks Find Professionals Support Calculations |
Divorce & Money:
| The Research Center: (Divorce Cases of Interest) | Research Home | ||||
Find Case Law, Case Analysis, and Divorce Information...
| |||||
Copyright© 1996-2009. All rights reserved by Divorce Source, Inc.
Comments & Suggestions? or Recommend This Page to a Friend!