Navigation Bar
< Home Page[About Us]


Why?
Subsription Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)

Cases of Interest: Joint Titling
National Legal Research Group, Inc.

ILLINOIS: In re Marriage of Smith, ___ Ill. App. 3d ___, 638 N.E.2d 384 (1994).
The husband's self-serving testimony that he transferred his premarital stock into joint title only for convenience and not to make a gift did not overcome the presumption that property held in joint tenancy is marital property.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

MAINE: Long v. Long, 697 A.2d 1317 (Me. 1997).
Jointly owned real property is subject to division as marital property even though parts of it were acquired with nonmarital funds.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

NEW JERSEY: Pascale v. Pascale, 274 N.J. Super. 429, 644 A.2d 638 (App. Div. 1994).
By selling her premarital stock and using the proceeds for a down payment on the jointly titled marital home, the wife made an interspousal gift and did not retain a separate ownership interest in the proceeds from the sale of the stock.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

NEW YORK: Haas v. Haas, ___ A.D.2d ___, 695 N.Y.S.2d 644 (1999).
Where the wife deposited two sums of money inherited from her father in a joint account, the money lost its character as separate property.
Subscription Read More About This Case

TENNESSEE: McClellan v. McClellan, 873 S.W.2d 350 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1993).
Marital residence which was purchased with husband's separate funds but titled in both spouses' names was marital property, but trial court did not err in awarding home to husband.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

VIRGINIA: Bchara v. Bchara, 38 Va. App. 302, 563 S.E.2d 398 (2002).
The mere fact that separate funds are conveyed into a joint account does not prevent the owner from tracing those funds to another source. The husband did not contribute significant efforts toward the increase in value of the wife's separate property by helping her to purchase the property at a more favorable price.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

VIRGINIA: Sprouse v. Griffin, No. 941647 (Va. Sup. Ct. June 9, 1995), rev'g Griffin v. Sprouse, 18 Va. App. 859, 448 S.E.2d 152 (1994).

While their divorce case was pending, the parties agreed to sell their jointly titled marital home and place the proceeds in escrow pending the equitable distribution hearing.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

Go to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page


State Home Archives Bulletin Menu Chat Rooms Family Law Links Publications Menu Dictionary


About Us | Monthly Newsletter | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Contact Us | Advertising

The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. A lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions.

© 1996 - 2012 Divorce Source, Inc. All Rights Reserved.