Navigation Bar
< Home Page[About Us]


Why?
Subsription Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)

Cases of Interest: Wiretapping
National Legal Research Group, Inc.

ILLINOIS: In re Marriage of Auriemma, ___ Ill. App. 3d ___, 648 N.E.2d 118 (1994).
The trial court abused its discretion by refusing to award attorney's fees for litigation surrounding an illegal wiretap placed in the wife's home.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

MISSISSIPPI: Wright v. Stanley, 23 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1405 (Miss. 1997)
While there is no interspousal exception to the federal wiretapping statute some states have held that there is a parent-child exception based on the doctrine of vicarious consent.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

NEW JERSEY: D'Onofrio v. D'Onofrio, No. A-5492-98T1 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Oct. 2, 2001).
The mother appealed the award of primary custody of the children to the father. The mother's primary argument was that audio tapes of coarse telephone conversations between the mother and the children should not have been admitted.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

UTAH: Thompson v. Dulaney, 20 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1089 (D. Utah 1993).
The parties were divorced in 1989. At a later custody proceeding, the wife introduced transcripts of phone conversations between her former husband and their two children, ages five and three. The children were living with the wife and her parents.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

Go to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page


State Home Archives Bulletin Menu Chat Rooms Family Law Links Publications Menu Dictionary


About Us | Monthly Newsletter | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Contact Us | Advertising

The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. A lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions.

© 1996 - 2012 Divorce Source, Inc. All Rights Reserved.