![]()
< Home Page [About Us]
![]()
Why?Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)
Cases of Interest: Worker's Compensation
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
COLORADO: In re Marriage of Breckenridge, 973 P.2d 1290 (Colo. Ct. App. 1999).
A lump-sum workers' compensation settlement that was awarded to the husband shortly before the parties' dissolution was his separate property to the extent it compensated him for the loss of postdissolution income or earning capacity.
Read More About This Case
CONNECTICUT: Tyc v. Tyc, 40 Conn. App. 562, 672 A.2d 526 (1996).
A spouse's award or claim for workers' compensation is property subject to distribution in a dissolution action.
Read More About This Case
ILLINOIS: In re Marriage of Hall, ___ Ill. App. 3d ___, 663 N.E.2d 430 (1996).
The husband's workers' compensation award was marital property, and granting the wife one-half of the award was not an abuse of discretion.
Read More About This Case
ILLINOIS: In re Marriage of Waggoner, ___ Ill. App. 3d ___, 634 N.E.2d 1198 (1994).
The "analytical" approach should be applied rather than the "mechanical" approach when classifying workers' compensation awards for permanent disability.
Read More About This Case
MARYLAND: Lowery v. Lowery, 113 Md. App. 423, 688 A.2d 65 (1997).
Although the husband's injury underlying his workers' compensation settlement occurred before the parties' marriage, the award should be classified as marital property to the extent that it compensated the husband for lost wages or future earning capacity during the marriage or for medical expenses paid out of marital assets.
Read More About This Case
MICHIGAN: Hagen v. Hagen, 202 Mich. App. 254, 508 N.W.2d 196 (1993).
Trial court could impress lien on husband's workers' compensation payments to enforce order awarding wife one-half of those payments.
Read More About This Case
OHIO: Hartzell v. Hartzell, 90 Ohio App. 3d 385, 629 N.E.2d 491 (1993).
Workers' compensation benefits that compensate for loss of earnings during the marriage and for expenses paid from marital assets constitute marital property.
Read More About This Case
PENNSYLVANIA: Drake v. Drake, ___ Pa. ___, 725 A.2d 717 (1999).
A workers' compensation commutation award that accrued during the marriage can be marital property even if it replaces future earnings, but it need not be distributed equally between the divorcing spouses.
Read More About This Case
WASHINGTON: Dugan-Gaunt v. Gaunt, ___ Wash. App. ___, 915 P.2d 541 (1996).
A state statute prohibiting the transfer of workers' compensation benefits precludes a court from ordering a spouse to pay over workers' compensation benefits pursuant to a property distribution agreement.
Read More About This Case
Go to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page[ Find a Divorce Professional to Help You With Your Divorce ]
Recommended Book: Fairshare Divorce for Women: The first book that gives women the support and guidance they need to safeguard their marital assets. Too often women find themselves at a disadvantage when their marriage ends.
Store Categories
State Guidebooks
Find Professionals
Support Calculations![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Research Center: (Divorce Cases of Interest) Research Home Find Case Law, Case Analysis, and Divorce Information...
Keyword(s)
Research Tips
Copyright© 1996-2009. All rights reserved by Divorce Source, Inc.
Comments & Suggestions? or Recommend This Page to a Friend!