Navigation Bar

Cases of InterestSearch
Income

VIRGINIA: Robinson v. Robinson, 45 Va. App. 682, 613 S.E.2d 484 (2005), reh'g en banc granted, 46 Va. App. 43, 614 S.E.2d 676 (2005)
The trial court erred by holding that passive income received from an inherited trust by a husband who did not work should be classified just like earned salary. Passive income from inherited property is separate property under the equitable distribution statute, and therefore is not to be treated as a salary substitute even if the husband did not work.
Read More About This Case

MISSOURI: Greiner v. Greiner, 146 S.W.3d 442 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).
The trial court erred by treating as separate property an investment account started before the marriage, to which no funds were contributed during the marriage. Some of the growth in the account was accumulated interest income, and all income from separate property is marital property, regardless of cause. On the facts, however, the error was harmless. A home acquired by the husband after separation, with a marital property down payment, was properly treated as marital property.
Read More About This Case

- All Income Cases of Interest
- Recent Cases of Interest

DS HomeArchivesBulletin MenuChat RoomsFamily Law Links Publications MenuDictionary


About Us | Monthly Newsletter | Terms & Conditions | Privacy Statement | Contact Us | Advertising

The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. A lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions.

© 1996 - 2012 Divorce Source, Inc. All Rights Reserved.