|
|
|
Source of Funds for Contributions to Marital Home
© 2003 National Legal Research Group, Inc.
GEORGIA: Snowden v. Alexander-Snowden, ___ Ga. ___, 587 S.E.2d 54 (2003).
The evidence was sufficient to prove the value of the wife's premarital home on the date of marriage and the amount of marital contributions to it, for purposes of applying the source of funds rule.
The trial court held that the wife's premarital home was entirely nonmarital property, even though marital funds were used to make mortgage payments on the home during the marriage. The Georgia Supreme Court reversed.
The court acknowledged that Georgia measures the marital and nonmarital interests in hybrid property under the source of funds rule. Under that rule, when marital contributions are made to nonmarital property, the marital estate acquires an interest in the property in the ratio of the nonmarital investment to the total nonmarital and marital investment in the property.
The trial court did not apply the source of funds rule because it found that there was no evidence to show the value of the property at the time of the marriage. While such information is necessary to show the contributing spouse's nonmarital investment in the property, the Georgia Supreme Court found that there was sufficient evidence by which the trial court could have calculated the value at the time of the marriage. The trial court's own findings showed that the wife paid $42,000 for the home in 1984 when she purchased it, that it was worth $75,000 at the time of the trial, that it had appreciated $1,941 per year since its purchase, and that it thus had appreciated $21,351 during the 11-year marriage. While no appraisal was introduced establishing the value of the property at the time of the marriage in 1988, the evidence available to the trial court enabled it to calculate that value, and it erred in failing to do so.
The trial court also denied application of the source of funds rule so as to award any interest to the husband because it determined that, while the husband had contributed to the home that the wife brought to the marriage, there was insufficient evidence introduced by the husband to show the exact amount of his contribution. The mortgage payments were deducted every month from the wife's military account. The husband's income was not specifically assigned by the parties to pay off the loan. The trial court believed that the only relevant marital funds for determining the marital investment in the property were those provided by the husband and since he could not provide records of the exact amount of his expenditures on the property, his claim for equitable division failed. The Georgia Supreme Court stated that this approach by the trial court was incorrect, and that that court had misunderstood the application of the source of funds rule. The relevant inquiry is whether the "marital unit," meaning both spouses, has contributed marital funds to the property. Here, although the evidence failed to show the precise amount of specific payments from the husband, it did show the exact amount of marital payments made by the marital unit to retire the mortgage debt over the 11-year marriage, that amount being the automatic deduction from the wife's military account. Therefore, even if the trial court could not specifically determine the amount of the non-mortgage-related contributions made by the husband, it had sufficient evidence to determine a minimum level of marital investment in the home based upon the marital unit paying off the loan balance. For this reason as well, it was error for the trial court to fail to apply the source of funds rule and to equitably divide the property. Its order awarding the entire interest in the property to the wife was reversed, and the matter was remanded.
Go to: Source of Funds Category
Go to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page
| Featured Services | |
|
| The Research Center: ( Cases of Interest by Category ) | Research Home | ||||
Find Case Law, Case Analysis, and Divorce Related Information...
| |||||
 How to Hire The Right Divorce Lawyer - You must have the right lawyer to have a successful divorce! provides a road map for finding an effective lawyer and then helps you to monitor his or her performance and fees. |
Comments & Suggestions? or Recommend This Page to a Friend!