|
|
|
Tracing Undocumented Divorce Case Oral Testimony
© 2004 National Legal Research Group, Inc.
NEW YORK: Cassara v. Cassara, ___ A.D.2d ___, 767 N.Y.S.2d 492 (2003).
The trial court did not err in finding that the husband's undocumented oral testimony was not sufficient to trace presently existing assets to a primary separate source.
The husband appealed from that portion of the trial court's order which denied him a credit against the distribution of marital assets for separate funds which he contributed to the purchase of properties, including the marital residence. The appellate division affirmed the distribution award and the denial of any credit. The court's decision emphasizes the need for strong evidence to reverse a trial court finding that separate property lost its character when used to acquire property during the marriage.
Prior to the marriage, the husband was the owner of a fuel oil business. Several years after the marriage, he sold the business for $600,000. Thereafter, he purchased a parcel of land for $107,000 with title held solely in his name. That same year, the parties began construction of the marital residence on a different parcel of land which the husband had held prior to the marriage. A mortgage was obtained on that property, and the wife's name was later added to the deed.
After the husband sued for dissolution of the marriage, the court granted the parties a divorce and ordered, inter alia, that the two parcels of property be sold and the proceeds divided equally between them. The husband argued that the lower court had erred in failing to credit him in the amount of $465,000, the amount of his contribution of separate property to the acquisition of the two properties, as well as construction of the marital residence. The appellate division agreed that the husband was entitled to a credit of $58,000, the value of the separate property he contributed to the purchase of the parcel he held prior to the marriage and upon which the marital residence was later built. It denied, however, that he could claim a credit for the remaining $407,000. The court's reasoning was based on the husband's failure to establish the source of the funds. He asserted that the funds used to purchase the one parcel and to construct the residence on the second parcel derived from the sale of his separately held business. The court failed to find a sufficient "paper trail" in the record documenting the distribution of funds from that sale. While the court acknowledged that this alone was not fatal to the husband's claim, it noted that he had also failed to provide documentation of his claim that the proceeds were placed in an account solely in his name, rather than commingled in a joint account, as the wife's testimony suggested, and thereby remained separate property. As a result, the husband failed to rebut the presumption that this once separate asset, the sale proceeds, became marital property. Moreover, the court added that, even assuming that the proceeds used to construct the marital residence did not come from a joint account, it was not persuaded that the husband had met his burden of showing that there was no other possible source for the moneys used to initially fund the construction of the home and the purchase of the other parcel of land, as he was required to do. During the marriage, the husband received revenues from several rent-generating properties. He failed to show that these funds were not the source for the above-referenced purchase and construction costs. The court was also influenced by the fact that a mortgage was obtained on the marital residence in both parties' names and that the record was unclear on whether the funds from this mortgage were used to finance additional construction or to reimburse the husband for his contributions. Because of these proof considerations, and in light of the finding by the trial court that the husband had failed to meet his burden, the appellate court held that there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to credit the husband's testimony as to the source of the funds and in denying him a credit for the $407,000.
Go to: Source of Funds Category
Go to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page
| Featured Services | |
|
| The Research Center: ( Cases of Interest by Category ) | Research Home | ||||
Find Case Law, Case Analysis, and Divorce Related Information...
| |||||
 How to Hire The Right Divorce Lawyer - You must have the right lawyer to have a successful divorce! provides a road map for finding an effective lawyer and then helps you to monitor his or her performance and fees. |
Comments & Suggestions? or Recommend This Page to a Friend!