![]()
< Home Page [About Us]
![]()
Why?Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)
Cases of Interest: Massachusetts
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
Adoption (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: White v. Laingor, No. SJC-08329 (Mass. Sup. Jud. Ct. Apr. 27, 2001).
Mother appealed enforcement of an agreement in which she agreed to accept a reduced lump-sum payment for child support arrearages in exchange for the father's consent to the adoption of children by her new hus-band even though the adoption did not occur.
Read More About This Case
Agreements (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Bracci v. Chiccarelli, 99-P-620 (Mass. App. Ct. Dec. 3, 2001).
"In 1986, the parties executed a modification agreement altering the terms of a judgment of divorce nisi entered in August, 1984. The agreement stated that it was to survive as a binding contract and not merge with any judgment.
Read More About This Case
Alimony (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Heins v. Ledis, 422 Mass. 477, 664 N.E.2d 10 (1996).
An award of alimony to reimburse the wife for her lost investment in the husband's business was improper.
Read More About This Case
MASSACHUSETTS: Johnston v. Johnston, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 531, 649 N.E.2d 799 (1995).
An alimony award to the wife in the amount she had received for many years during the pendency of the divorce action was not excessive even though she received $3 million as an equitable division of the parties' property.
Read More About This Case
Children (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Johnson v. Johnson, 425 Mass. 693, 682 N.E.2d 865 (1997).
The trial judge in a divorce proceeding does not have authority to assign property to a third party, even to children of the marriage.
Read More About This Case
Classification of Assets (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Zeh v. Zeh, ___ Mass. App. Ct. ___, 618 N.E.2d 1376 (1993).
Husband's inheritance from his father, who died five years before divorce hearing, fell within category of assets subject to division, even though the legacy had not yet been distributed.
Read More About This Case
Cohabitation (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Moriarty v. Stone, 41 Mass. App. Ct. 151, 668 N.E.2d 1338 (1996).
The parties' contributions during their 10-year period of cohabitation before marriage were properly considered by the trial court as a factor in the division of their property.
Read More About This Case
Factors in Award (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Moriarty v. Stone, 41 Mass. App. Ct. 151, 668 N.E.2d 1338 (1996).
The parties' contributions during their 10-year period of cohabitation before marriage were properly considered by the trial court as a factor in the division of their property.
Read More About This Case
Inherited Property (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Zeh v. Zeh, ___ Mass. App. Ct. ___, 618 N.E.2d 1376 (1993).
Husband's inheritance from his father, who died five years before divorce hearing, fell within category of assets subject to division, even though the legacy had not yet been distributed.
Read More About This Case
Jurisdiction (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Windsor v. Windsor, 45 Mass. App. Ct. 650, 700 N.E.2d 838 (1998).
The trial court lacked personal jurisdiction over the husband, who had not maintained a marital domicile in Massachusetts for more than 30 years, so as to permit equitable distribution of his assets.
Read More About This Case
MASSACHUSETTS: Anderson v. Anderson, 39 Mass. App. Ct. 907, 654 N.E.2d 65 (1995).
Provisions of a New Hampshire divorce decree concerning equitable distribution were not valid despite the husband's domicile there since the wife had previously filed a Massachusetts divorce action and Massachusetts retained personal jurisdiction over the property issues.
Read More About This Case
Stock Options (full category)MASSACHUSETTS: Baccanti v. Morton, No. SJC-08442 (Mass. Aug. 13, 2001).
The husband argued on appeal that the judge erred in awarding the wife one-half of his issued but unvested employee stock options. He claims that the options should not have been considered marital property subject to division because they would not vest until after dissolution of the marriage.
Read More About This Case
Go to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page[ Find a Divorce Professional to Help You With Your Divorce ]
Recommended Book: Tax Aspects of Divorce: The book has proven to be invaluable to people experiencing divorce or separation. It is a thorough reference for every Internal Revenue Code Section that is likely to be encountered in the divorce process.
Store Categories
State Guidebooks
Find Professionals
Support Calculations![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
The Research Center: (Divorce Cases of Interest) Research Home Find Case Law, Case Analysis, and Divorce Information...
Keyword(s)
Research Tips
Copyright© 1996-2009. All rights reserved by Divorce Source, Inc.
Comments & Suggestions? or Recommend This Page to a Friend!