< Home Page [About Us] Why? Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)

Cases of Interest: Montana
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.

Classification of Assets (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Hanni, 2000 MT 59, 997 P.2d 760 (2000).
The trial court excluded the husband's profit-sharing plan in his accounting firm from the marital estate when determining equitable division of the marital property.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Smith, ___ Mont. ___, 871 P.2d 884 (1994).
The trial court could not include property inherited by the husband during separation in the marital estate, where the wife did not make any contribution to the inherited property.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Meeks, ___ Mont. ___, 915 P.2d 851 (1996).
The husband's accrued vacation and sick leave was not a distinct marital asset, but should be added, as per his pension plan, to his term of service for purposes of calculating his pension benefits.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Beadle, ___ Mont. ___, 968 P.2d 698 (1998).
A spouse's possible future inheritance may never be included in the marital estate.
Read More About This Case

Closely Held Businesses (full category)

MONTANA: Harper v. Harper, ___ Mont. ___, 994 P.2d 1 (1999).
The wife was not entitled to stock shares in a closely held family corporation that had been gifted to the husband by his parents.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of DeCosse, ___ Mont. ___, 936 P.2d 821 (1997).
The valuation of stock set forth in a shareholder's agreement is presumptively the real value of a shareholder's interest in a closely held corporation if the shareholders have employed an acceptable method of valuation and there is no evidence that the valuation was undertaken in bad faith or for the purpose of avoiding marital or debtor/creditor responsibilities.
Read More About This Case

Death of Spouse (full category)

MONTANA: In re Estate of Goick, ___ Mont. ___, 909 P.2d 1165 (1996).
The wife was the surviving spouse for purposes of intestate succession even though the trial court had previously stated that the parties were divorced, because no order had been entered purporting to terminate all marital property rights.
Read More About This Case

Division of Property (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Davis, ___ Mont. ___, 986 P.2d 408 (1999).
The statutory criteria for dividing marital property in a dissolution proceeding is the same whether the marital property was received by gift or by inheritance.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Binsfield, ___ Mont. ___, 888 P.2d 889 (1995).
The trial court did not err in ordering an in-kind distribution of the parties' real property.
Read More About This Case

Estoppel (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of McNellis, ___ Mont. ___, 885 P.2d 412 (1994).
The husband was estopped from changing his testimony concerning the value of a family investment, where he had all along asserted that the property was worth a certain amount but then sought to revise his estimate at trial.
Read More About This Case

Factors in Award (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Barker, ___ Mont. ___, 870 P.2d 86 (1994).
The fact that the wife single-handedly rescued the marital home from foreclosure supported the court's conclusion that she should be awarded all the equity in the marital home.
Read More About This Case

Fraud (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Miller, ___ Mont. ___, 902 P.2d 1019 (1995).
A dissolution decree may not be set aside based on a motion claiming intrinsic fraud filed more than 60 days after entry of the decree.
Read More About This Case

Gifts (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Davis, ___ Mont. ___, 986 P.2d 408 (1999).
The statutory criteria for dividing marital property in a dissolution proceeding is the same whether the marital property was received by gift or by inheritance.
Read More About This Case

Inherited Property (full category)

MONTANA: Stoneman v. Drollinger, ___ Mont. ___, 14 P.3d 12 (2000).
The husband inherited certain property from his grandmother. Portions of this inherited property were sold and used to purchase buffalo.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Beadle, ___ Mont. ___, 968 P.2d 698 (1998).
A spouse's possible future inheritance may never be included in the marital estate.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Smith, ___ Mont. ___, 871 P.2d 884 (1994).
The trial court could not include property inherited by the husband during separation in the marital estate, where the wife did not make any contribution to the inherited property.
Read More About This Case

Interest (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of DeBuff, ___ Mont. ___, 50 P.3d 1070 (2002).
The trial court was not required to consider speculative capital gains taxes which might be due at some future point if the husband sold his share of the marital property. The trial court did not err by refusing to recognize a $120,000 marital asset merely because the husband's income had exceeded his expenses by this amount in a prior tax year.
Read More About This Case

Marital Home (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Barker, ___ Mont. ___, 870 P.2d 86 (1994).
The fact that the wife single-handedly rescued the marital home from foreclosure supported the court's conclusion that she should be awarded all the equity in the marital home.
Read More About This Case

Pensions (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Pfennigs, ___ Mont. ___, 989 P.2d 327 (1999).
The couple's property settlement agreement clearly and unambiguously entitled the wife to 50% of the husband's retirement benefits valued as of the date of the husband's retirement rather than the date of the execution of the agreement.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Meeks, ___ Mont. ___, 915 P.2d 851 (1996).
The husband's accrued vacation and sick leave was not a distinct marital asset, but should be added, as per his pension plan, to his term of service for purposes of calculating his pension benefits.
Read More About This Case

Personal Injury Awards (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Doyle, ___ Mont. ___, 929 P.2d 886 (1996).
The husband's alleged misrepresentation of asset values and other facts could not be characterized as fraud upon the court or extrinsic fraud so as to permit relief from judgment.
Read More About This Case

Postdecree Proceedings (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Miller, ___ Mont. ___, 902 P.2d 1019 (1995).
A dissolution decree may not be set aside based on a motion claiming intrinsic fraud filed more than 60 days after entry of the decree.
Read More About This Case

Religion (full category)

MONTANA: Ficker v. Ficker, No. ED77871 (Mo. Ct. App. Oct. 23, 2001).
The husband argued that the court impermissibly, in violation of the First Amendment, considered his affiliation with the Church Universal and Triumphant. The appellate court held that while inquiry into religious beliefs per se is unconstitutional.
Read More About This Case

Separation (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Smith, ___ Mont. ___, 871 P.2d 884 (1994).
The trial court could not include property inherited by the husband during separation in the marital estate, where the wife did not make any contribution to the inherited property.
Read More About This Case

Stocks (full category)

MONTANA: Harper v. Harper, ___ Mont. ___, 994 P.2d 1 (1999).
The wife was not entitled to stock shares in a closely held family corporation that had been gifted to the husband by his parents.
Read More About This Case

Tax Consequences (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of DeBuff, ___ Mont. ___, 50 P.3d 1070 (2002).
The trial court was not required to award postjudgment interest on a monetary award at the statutory judgment rate. It could choose to award interest at a lesser rate, which was reasonable under the facts.
Read More About This Case

Valuation of Property (full category)

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Hollow, 2001 MT 308, 2001.MT.0000414 (Mont. Dec. 31, 2001).
The question presented here was whether the lower court erred by assigning no value to the couple's business. In this case, the couple was married in 1976 and separated in 1999. The husband had a Bachelor of Arts degree in secondary education and at the time of the appeal taught at the Riverside Girls Correctional Facility in Boulder, Montana.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of Neal, ___ Mont. ___, 884 P.2d 789 (1994).
The trial court erred when it valued the family farm by treating as a liability the operating loan debt without also adding in the value of the in-ground crops created through that debt.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of McNellis, ___ Mont. ___, 885 P.2d 412 (1994).
The husband was estopped from changing his testimony concerning the value of a family investment, where he had all along asserted that the property was worth a certain amount but then sought to revise his estimate at trial.
Read More About This Case

MONTANA: In re Marriage of DeCosse, ___ Mont. ___, 936 P.2d 821 (1997).
The valuation of stock set forth in a shareholder's agreement is presumptively the real value of a shareholder's interest in a closely held corporation if the shareholders have employed an acceptable method of valuation and there is no evidence that the valuation was undertaken in bad faith or for the purpose of avoiding marital or debtor/creditor responsibilities.
Read More About This Case

Go to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page

[ Find a Divorce Professional to Help You With Your Divorce ]

Recommended Book: State Guidebooks with Forms: divorce laws, procedures and step by step explanations to help you understand divorce in your state!

Store Categories State Guidebooks Find Professionals Support Calculations