| Renny |
| (addict) |
| 04/16/12 07:46 PM |
Re: Petitioner lies and respondent has to pay?
|
Lets back up a moment. All you have now are a petition for divorce if im not mistaken. Why is DV even mentioned? At any rate, the DV incidents are certainly relevant to custody, and if there are no children, strong restraining order language can go into the CO. I'd have to know more about the denial of DV to say whether it can be exploited to impugn the petioners credibility. What does the respondent want out of this divorce?