it was a summons for me to appear for her proof that I was living in TN with a woman. at first it was for mainly proof that i was living with another woman in TN. they said they had proof but there was no proof because i have been living in NC ever since I left Oct 1 2007. apparently they found out I was really living in NC this whole time so they changed their focus on supervised visitation. is that legal, because I had no time to prepare for supervised visitation. i even asked for a continuance but her lawyer said she was going to say no because they had proof i was in TN. SO I FILED FOR A CONTINUANCE anyway but got scared because everyone was telling me i need a lawyer and i got one and i believe she was negligent. i briefed her before we went into the courtroom because she told me they were going to focus on supervised visitation. and I told her that my wife was also on prescription drugs and drank wine with Aaron in the car. She was on Hydrocodone just like me but my lawyer did not address it to the court even though i continually was asking her to before and while we were in the actual hearing. she kept saying ,hold on. and then the judge started ruling and i said stop him and she said I can't he has already started ruling. is this right. could not she have interrupted and said we have more questions.
|
Re: thinking about mediation