|
|
|||||||
|
"He already had the potential to kill, and he likely DID kill." Based on what? The complete and total lack of evidence that he had anything to do with his wife missing? "So CPS/courts couldn't "push" him to do what he'd had the capability to do and DID do (in all likelihood) before." That is ridiculous. If NO ONE could EVER be pushed to do something they were not capable of, then there would be no reason for any "justifiable" cases or anything like that. Could you shoot someone? COuld you shoot someone if they had a gun to your child's head? So are you dangerous because you are CAPABLE of shooting someone, even though it is only under extreme situations? |