Rebecca5
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/05
Posts: 11697
Loc: Down home.
|
|
There's a pretty large difference between disagreeing with someone's opinion, disliking their approach, or insulting them.
It is possible to do the first two without the third. Insulting someone just makes people look....small. It comes across as, "I have no basis for my disagreement, so I'm going to insult your gender by making some derrogatory comment." I mean, really. Why not just stick to, "Oh yeah? Your mother wears combat boots."
:-P
|
Cinder2
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/05
Posts: 4361
Loc: Southern California
|
|
Wow, Blah. Anyone who wants to refer to women as "clams" certainly needs more than this website can provide.
|
Blah
member
Reged: 07/13/05
Posts: 104
Loc: Fla.
|
|
I'll just let you girlys chat. What's the point of a MEN'S RIGHTS forum if no MEN come here?
Blah
I calls 'em like I sees 'em!
|
matart1
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 09/01/05
Posts: 2798
|
|
well I guess you summed it up.
no MEN come here.
since most men I know do not speak as such as you.
maybe if you owned up to to what you cause then maybe your excuses will be more truthful.
--------------------
Life is a long lesson in humility.
|
Blah
member
Reged: 07/13/05
Posts: 104
Loc: Fla.
|
|
As I said, no MEN post here. Are you one? I rest my case!
Blah
Clam opener!
|
allison
newbie
Reged: 09/24/05
Posts: 44
Loc: So Cal
|
|
Boy do I feel sorry for your 11 year old daughter...is that wwho you refered to when u used to the term "clam opener"? How will you feel when her first boyfriend uses that term...or will u b drinkin beers with him...? My prayers are with her.....poor child
--------------------
Its always darkest just before it goes pitch black" - www.despair.com
|
Pete
member
Reged: 12/30/04
Posts: 132
|
|
Blah is absolutely right. Women have no more intuitive need to post on Mens forum that Men do of posting on a labor pain website. Women can claim they "understand" all they want, but the only person who can understand a man/father's dilemma with respect to divorce is a Man.
There is a reason Men do not post here.
1 Reason is that this site is infested with a lunatic named Eric who has about as much productive benefit to men's rights as a paper towel roll to clean to up the mess in New Orleans.
2nd Reason is that Men need to deal with men on issues because it is far easier for men to easily communicate on the issue without getting the typical woman's perspective. They just don't want it or need it.
Bottom line, if Men were able to freely discuss amongst Men their issues in divorce, more would post here. But as is the case here, it is usually occupied by only Women and a lunatic.
Blah should be applauded for his effort to get men here and women off of the mens forum, but that is kind of like trying to empty lake Michigan with a spoon.
--------------------
Integrity is doing the right thing when no one is looking.
|
Blah
member
Reged: 07/13/05
Posts: 104
Loc: Fla.
|
|
Thank you from an actual MAN! Yes I do speak to my daughter like that. Since her Mom ran out on both of us we like to joke in seafood jargon. Lighten up Moron!
Blah
That cute Lil fuzzball!
|
allison
newbie
Reged: 09/24/05
Posts: 44
Loc: So Cal
|
|
No...its a forum about Men's Rights, not a tree fort - and it's funny - I see your name all over the Women's Rights forum, with the same negative mean spirited comments - I'm looking for the "rule book" on this web site but I can't seem to locate that page where you found the clause that forbids anyone from posting on any forum, in an effort to give people it a difficult place in their lives some perspective from any "side" that may be able to shed some light, good or bad
Why don't you ask the webmaster to issue a secret code that only men can use, so you can have an exclusive club where you can bash anyone that doesn't fit in to your idea of how things should be.....maybe you can start your own website so you wont have to contend with people you dont want to in a public forum.
I have considered the possibility that maybe you are not a man....maybe u are an angry woman playing a comedy on all the men on the Men's Rights forum....hard to tell when you dont use your real name...
--------------------
Its always darkest just before it goes pitch black" - www.despair.com
|
FIRM
journeyman
Reged: 09/29/05
Posts: 99
|
|
Bingo, Allison! :)
I just woke up (couldn't get back to sleep).
Just look at who "supports" blah (really Rah):
1.) Captain Jim AKA CJ and more than 11 KNOWN names of which, most are female. Personally? I think that Rah/blah is CJ. CJ, before posting as Rah/blah, posted disdain thoughts about females...
2.)Maury/Lawmoe, a homosexual activist that states that he/she is an attorney, but gives out erroneous advice that even an imbecile should know better about...
3.)Pete-enough said...
4.)Scott-enough said...
5.) Gr8Dad. I could go on and on about that idiot, but all you have to do is look at his/her support of Rah/blah and things become self-evident...
6.)All the "new names" that support the above idiots as they need the "new names" to support their misandry...
When people attack the messenger as opposed the post, then we know what their agendas are...
Tricky Dicky is a "newbie," Slick Willy is a "newbie" in deceit and propagation of lies and the perpetuation of them compared to the above...
As on the home page of FIRM:
Feminism's Thousand Year Reich
August 12, 2003
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
by Carey Roberts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When persons call for the decimation of half the world's population, that grabs my attention. This is what I'm talking about:
"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female.
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." --Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001.
These proposals are disturbing in their own right. What is even more troubling is that no feminist has ever repudiated them.
When feminists call for global "decontamination" by phasing-out men, I can't help but think of the lies and accusations leveled against the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the similarities to contemporary gender feminism:
1. Biological superiority: The National Socialists preached the genetic superiority of the Aryan race. Now, a feminist-oriented World Health Organization website claims that women enjoy an "inherent biological advantage."
2. Sub-human: In the 1930s, the Jews were called vermin and "Judensau" (Jew-pig). Thirty years later, feminists referred to men as "male chauvinist pigs."
3. Conspiracy theory: The Jews were often accused of "working together" to pollute German culture. Now, feminists refer to the so-called conspiracy against women as "the patriarchy."
4. Excessive influence: Seventy years ago, Jews were accused of controlling the German economy. Now, men are accused of "having all the power."
5. Threat to the greater welfare: The Jews were blacklisted as toxic to German culture. In the present era, Gloria Steinem writes, "The most dangerous situation for a woman is....a husband or lover in the isolation of their own home."
6. Faulty science: Just as Hitler's propagandists once dismissed Albert Einstein's discoveries as "Jewish physics," feminist scholars now ridicule male scientific breakthroughs as the product of "linear" and "hierarchical" thinking.
7. Spread of a dread disease: In Nazi Germany, Jews were falsely accused of spreading of untreatable syphilis. Now, UNICEF director Carol Belamy unfairly blames men for the spread of AIDS in Africa.
8. Sexual contact: Hitler was obsessed with keeping Jewish men from "defiling" the racial purity of Aryan women. Now, according to Catherine McKinnon, "In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape."
But the most fascinating parallel between Germany in the 1930s and the current era lies in the conscious use of deception to sway public opinion.
In her brilliant exposé, Who Stole Feminism?, Christina Hoff Sommers documents the many fabrications of gender feminism. Indeed, the entire ideological foundation of feminism rests on what columnist Wendy McElroy calls the "Great Lie" -- the wrong-headed notion that women are the eternal victims of male-dominated culture.
The feminist Great Lie echoes the infamous passage from Mein Kampf that says, "The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed....The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one."
The effect of the Nazi accusations was to convince the German public and the world at large that Jews were not part of humanity, and thus not deserving of fundamental human rights.
Once the dehumanization and demoralization of the Jews was complete, the stage was set for the horrors that were to commence in 1939.
So what does the future hold for the male species?
Carey Roberts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carey Roberts is a researcher and consultant who tracks gender bias in the mainstream media.
--------------------
Equality is not a difficult concept...
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
