gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30372
|
|
Interestingly enough, the local "gang" in Sanford, uses, as its "symbol" black hoodies. Martin was WEARING a BLACK HOODIE.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
toomom
member
Reged: 05/13/12
Posts: 141
|
|
I will address your confusion:
In the interview:
At 7:02 Zimmerman admitts that Trayvon was NOT running mabe skipping
7:44 dispatcher asks are you following him? Zimmerman says YES
8:58 Zimmerman SAYS on CAMARA that he was walking to his house so he could tell the police the actuall street name and number where they should meet him.
So, this clown decided to walk home to get his actual street number to tell the police?
|
Gecko
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/01/04
Posts: 19891
Loc: Third rock from the sun
|
|
Interestingly enough, the local "gang" in Sanford, uses, as its "symbol" black hoodies. Martin was WEARING a BLACK HOODIE.
---> So any one wearing/owning a black hoodie in Sanford is a gang member? Just asking, because if I go to Sandford, I want to make sure I don't wear mime. And I have a light grey one and a navy one...so maybe you can tell me in what city AND what state that I shouldn't wear them.
--------------------
If you air your dirty linen in public, expect people to comment on the skid marks!
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30372
|
|
Well, would you wear a blue or red bandana in certain parts of LA? Not saying it was wrong for Martin to have worn it, but it gave anyone from the area suspicion that it was a gang member.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
Gecko
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/01/04
Posts: 19891
Loc: Third rock from the sun
|
|
So the answer is 'yes'.
--------------------
If you air your dirty linen in public, expect people to comment on the skid marks!
|
googledad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/31/05
Posts: 10207
|
|
No, its NOT. Try reading the comments sections under the stories about this. There are people, MANY people, under the impression even if Trayvon DID attack Zimmerman, he STILL did not have the right to defend himself.
>>>>>>>>>> Comments on websites HAVE NOTHING to do with why he was charged .
Did they make the investigating officer recommend charges ?
So tell me, IF Trayvon attacked Zimmerman, and that fact is proven, would you support a finding of self defense?
>>>>>>>>>>> If PROVEN , maybe . It's unlikely anything will EVER be proven but Zimmerman's lies make him UNBELIEVABLE .
All the evidence points in that direction, and there is ZERO evidence that it happened ANY other way.
>>>>>>>>>> Untrue .
You can float your made up crap, and OPINION crap all day long, bottom line, MARTIN'S girlfriend stated that Martin made first contact
>>>>>>>>> Nope .
His GF said Trayvon asked " why are you following me " .
Of course George said HE WASN"'T following Trayvon .
George said that Trayvon said " yo homey , you got a problem " ?
So who's lying ?
Zimmerman has the injuries consistant with an attack
>>>>>>>>> Nope , with a fight .
Whereare lumps on the back of Zimmerman's head from having his head slammed repeatedly into concrete ?
and Martin has one injury, consistent with PUNCHING someone.
>>>>>>>>>> Nope . That would depend on whether he's left or right handed and I'd expect the " injury " to his knuckle , not below it .
--------------------
Careful. We don't want to learn from this.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
