Maury
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 8146
Loc: This Asylum --->
|
|
Wow --better check the mail man
|
okgirl25
addict
Reged: 03/30/06
Posts: 623
|
|
*not sayin a word!*
He now has 4 girls by 3 women, and is doing his dangedest to use that to get out of CS to me. I have the Divorce drawn up with an even amt. WITH ability to go back and modify it IF there is a 20% change or more in either of our incomes.....I ain't no dummy LOL I'm covering my butt with him, he spent 2 years wasting time so I couldn't get this Divorce done, so now.....I'm 'gitn er done' (to quote the yokels here)
|
Maury
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 8146
Loc: This Asylum --->
|
|
Many states don't provide a reduction for subsequently born children since it is considered a choice while knowing of the existing obligation.
I believe there are about 5 states that deviate from that rule.
|
okgirl25
addict
Reged: 03/30/06
Posts: 623
|
|
In my state he only gets a break (albeit a small one) IF he has a Court Order for CS on his other kids....he hasn't on his first 2, sure as heck will on mine....and better hope he doesn't break up with his gf because this baby was her 4th, she stays home and is uneducated and he makes almost $50K a year.......his life would suck
|
Maury
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 8146
Loc: This Asylum --->
|
|
Yes--serial children are rough for payers.
Example. Presently, one child in Minnesota, the NCP pays 25% of net income. Two children 30%, and three 35%.
Two kids from two moms. 25% of net for the first one. That 25% is then deducted from net. Second child 25% of remaining proceeds and so on.
|
okgirl25
addict
Reged: 03/30/06
Posts: 623
|
|
Yeah, he's in Oregon too. Cost of living is NUTS up there....he pays $1000 a month for his 3 bedroom trailer in a park....
PLUS he has about 30% of his check taken in taxes cause he's single with no deductions (well now he has the baby)
|
Lucy44
old hand
Reged: 07/11/05
Posts: 874
Loc: Rochester, MN
|
|
Yikes!!
That DOES get expensive! Is that including income from second jobs?
--------------------
Experience is a wonderful thing.
It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.
|
Maury
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 8146
Loc: This Asylum --->
|
|
Depends on your state. In Minnesota, a new job (not worked consistently for two years before the initial child support determination), income beyond a full time job is not considered.
In Wisconsin, all sources are considered.
|
Muad_Dib
member
Reged: 10/25/05
Posts: 199
Loc: Oregon
|
|
You have to pay because your hubby was SMART, unlike me...
I supported my wife and was the sole breadwinner for the household while she stayed home with the kids. Until she refused to go back to work and I had to FORCE her..
I managed all the money correctly, we took some vacations, we saved some money, we had no debt. When we divorced she got half but didn't have to work for it....
Your hubby is smart...Traditional marriage sucks...Just build up debt until you divorce, then the woman has no incentive to divorce. If you build up wealth, she has every incentive to divorce.
--------------------
One man's "magic" is another man's engineering. "Supernatural" is a null word.
|
MamaKitty
Pooh-Bah
Reged: 01/30/06
Posts: 1632
Loc: California
|
|
You need to get your story straight.
Either your ex wife never worked, or screwed you over because she didn't work, or... she now has a great job that you're bitching about.
You've said both.
She never would work no matter how much you begged because your job wasn't enough to take care of your family and you needed her help, or.... she never worked, ever, or...she has such a great job that it's disgusting that she should want any support for taking care of your daughter for you. Make up your mind one way or the other, because you can't have it 3 ways.
c
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
