Wife_Abandonment
recently joined
Reged: 09/03/07
Posts: 2
|
|
Hi!
I'm a researcher and writer who is doing a study of marriages that end suddenly with the husband leaving without previously letting his wife know he was unhappy. These would be situations in which the wife believed herself to be in a good marriage. I'm looking for men to participate in my study by completing a questionnaire.
I'd love to hear your point of view!
Contact:
divorcestudy@videotron.ca
|
CaptainJim
enthusiast
Reged: 01/15/05
Posts: 378
Loc: FLORIDA
|
|
I don't think you'd care to hear my point of view about you or your little experiment.
--------------------
Single dad who won custody
|
Hulk
journeyman
Reged: 11/02/07
Posts: 80
|
|
I can't help but think that studies like these can be beneficial.
Of course, they can also be shown to be biased.
So personally, I am perplexed as to why you want to do such a study.
If it's to show that men are bad and women are good, then I think you have a problem with reality since up to 88% of women leave their mates based upon the supposed premise for your study.
If you are incorporating the latter paragraph to try to show similarities and/or opposites to the equation, this might be worthwhile.
So, if you bother to respond to posts regarding the "whys" of your post, let's get started since I do know a few men that meet your criteria to study.
But, if your sole purpose is to denigrate men, you have surely come to the wrong place.
So, I/we want to know your qualifications including how far in math you have studied and this includes quantitative analysis.
Please advise and you may get an intellectual response instead of some asinine grunt as you have already experienced in the above post from the board's neanderthal.
|
Maury
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 8146
Loc: This Asylum --->
|
|
By all means - interview E ric. I have never seen a stuidy written as a comedy.
|
Gr8JohnDoe
newbie
Reged: 03/05/08
Posts: 46
|
|
Ha...Ha...Ha...
So clever!
;)
So, did you find that woman as suggested or still drinking that fine single malt (or is that malt beer?) well deserved after gutting the household's income that should have been used for the split-up and/or the children?
Just wondering is all...
|
MeanGirlsRCrass
member
Reged: 02/25/08
Posts: 150
|
|
just lookity at that!
We have both of the mean girls in this thread.
How cute.
Grunt!
|
CaptainJim
enthusiast
Reged: 01/15/05
Posts: 378
Loc: FLORIDA
|
|
Hey Maury he thinks we're cute. It's probably a good thing we're not 13 years old.
--------------------
Single dad who won custody
|
Gr8JohnDoe
newbie
Reged: 03/05/08
Posts: 46
|
|
Got any new, sick, comedy?
Amazing how those that claim others "need" the last word are really the one's that practice it.
Amazing how those that claim in multiple names have been PROVEN to post in multiple names.
Amazing how those that complain about others actions, are really what they themselves do.
Amazing how those that complain about others are really complaining about the things that they do themselves.
Amazing how it is ok for them to do it, but not others...
Amazing...
Sickos...
|
googledad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/31/05
Posts: 10207
|
|
Feel free to ignore posts by these members , they are the creation of one rather demented individual , E ric A. Ericson . His goal is not to help anyone , but to grandstand for his own sick amusement . He has been banned from numerous message boards ( Sparc , dadsdivorce , custody reform , mensnewsdaily ) for his anti-social views and general nastiness which is why he sticks to DSource now , an unmoderated forum where he can spew his garbage . He has many more usernames but these are the ones he usually posts under .
1.ALPadre
2.AZFather
3. Batman
4. CAFather
5. COFather
6. Crapstinks
7. Daltonview
8. DEFather
9. DubiousWonder
10. EOP
11. Equality123
12. Equality4NCP
13. EricTheGreat101
14. ESP
15. FathersRBest
16. FathersRParents2
17. FIRM321
18. Flpadre
19. GAPadre
20. GreenLantern8
21. Gr8Flash
22. Gr8JohnDoe
23. HIFather
24. Hulk
25. IHatefpigs
26. IMissThem2
27. INPadre
28. JBGuud
29. LogicalGeorge
30. LooseScrew101
31. LoveHurts
32. MeanGirlsRCrass
33. MIPappa
34. MNFather
35. MRA
36. MrPowerRanger
37. MTFather
38. NJFather
39. NofPigs
40. NYDaddy
41. OffWiththeirHead
42. PainedFather
43. PhoenixActivist
44. PIGSFly
45. Prometheus
46. Robin08
47. ShagALot08
48. SirHumpALot08
49. Spiderman
50. StupidWomen
51. Stop
52. SuferingMisandry
53. SuperEric
54. SuperEricWon
55. Superman
56. THandSoftP
57. TrueMan
58. WhosTheCutest
--------------------
Careful. We don't want to learn from this.
|
Gr8JohnDoe
newbie
Reged: 03/05/08
Posts: 46
|
|
One thing we can say for sure about the Nazis is that their lies worked, for awhile...with this motto:
Hitler said in "Mein Kampf" that if you tell a lie for the purpose of propaganda, tell a big one! Because the bigger the lie is, the more people are apt to believe it, because they can't believe you would dare to tell such a big lie unless it was the truth!
It seems that some have a difficulty with the term, "feminazi." So much so, that they can only reflect upon the members of F_IRM (Fathers Integrity & Rights Movement-named by a woman, btw...).
Well, this misconception is totally wrong yet continues to be propagated by...guess who...the feminazi PIGS.
In fact, the term feminazi is so colloquial, all mainstream dictionaries have a definition of what a feminazi is:
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/feminazi
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/feminazi
Hell, even the encyclopedias have their say too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminazi
This is certainly not a new term and is certainly MAINSTREAM.
But, natch, the person that really describes the term for what it really means is SuperEric:
"Feminazi is a term to describe a select group of women. Not all women. Not feminists. It describes militant type feminists that use the doctrines and dogmas of Marxism/communism, believes in the eradication of the family unit and more specifically, men, to believe a female over a male when encountering law enforcement & courts and to put women in a group that is "more equal." They use the techniques culled from the Nazi ideology to accomplish their goals."
Others broach the subject:
by Carey Roberts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When persons call for the decimation of half the world's population, that grabs my attention. This is what I'm talking about:
"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future - If There Is One - Is Female.
"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." --Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001.
These proposals are disturbing in their own right. What is even more troubling is that no feminist has ever repudiated them.
When feminists call for global "decontamination" by phasing-out men, I can't help but think of the lies and accusations leveled against the Jews in Nazi Germany, and the similarities to contemporary gender feminism:
1. Biological superiority: The National Socialists preached the genetic superiority of the Aryan race. Now, a feminist-oriented World Health Organization website claims that women enjoy an "inherent biological advantage."
2. Sub-human: In the 1930s, the Jews were called vermin and "Judensau" (Jew-pig). Thirty years later, feminists referred to men as "male chauvinist pigs."
3. Conspiracy theory: The Jews were often accused of "working together" to pollute German culture. Now, feminists refer to the so-called conspiracy against women as "the patriarchy."
4. Excessive influence: Seventy years ago, Jews were accused of controlling the German economy. Now, men are accused of "having all the power."
5. Threat to the greater welfare: The Jews were blacklisted as toxic to German culture. In the present era, Gloria Steinem writes, "The most dangerous situation for a woman is....a husband or lover in the isolation of their own home."
6. Faulty science: Just as Hitler's propagandists once dismissed Albert Einstein's discoveries as "Jewish physics," feminist scholars now ridicule male scientific breakthroughs as the product of "linear" and "hierarchical" thinking.
7. Spread of a dread disease: In Nazi Germany, Jews were falsely accused of spreading of untreatable syphilis. Now, UNICEF director Carol Belamy unfairly blames men for the spread of AIDS in Africa.
8. Sexual contact: Hitler was obsessed with keeping Jewish men from "defiling" the racial purity of Aryan women. Now, according to Catherine McKinnon, "In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape."
But the most fascinating parallel between Germany in the 1930s and the current era lies in the conscious use of deception to sway public opinion.
In her brilliant exposé, Who Stole Feminism?, Christina Hoff Sommers documents the many fabrications of gender feminism. Indeed, the entire ideological foundation of feminism rests on what columnist Wendy McElroy calls the "Great Lie" -- the wrong-headed notion that women are the eternal victims of male-dominated culture.
The feminist Great Lie echoes the infamous passage from Mein Kampf that says, "The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed....The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one."
The effect of the Nazi accusations was to convince the German public and the world at large that Jews were not part of humanity, and thus not deserving of fundamental human rights.
Once the dehumanization and demoralization of the Jews was complete, the stage was set for the horrors that were to commence in 1939.
So what does the future hold for the male species?
Carey Roberts
Carey Roberts is a researcher and consultant who tracks gender bias in the mainstream media.
Still, others try to make it more specific:
by Angry Harry <mailto:admin@angryharry.com>
30 Reasons Why Feminists Really Are 'Feminazis'
Nope. AH has not yet written Part III of his explanation of how it is that multi-cellular organisms and multi-peopled organisations are so amazingly similar.
He has been far too busy!
And he keeps being distracted from writing it.
And one major recent distraction was caused by an email from T who wanted to know why anti-feminists keep insisting that feminism and Nazism are very similar.
Well. The reason is this.
The Nazis were around well before the heavy-duty violence and the gas chambers. And for quite some time they operated in a manner that paralleled in many ways the more recent activities of feminists.
Furthermore, feminist and Nazi ideology have a lot in common.
AH very occasionally receives an email saying that it is outrageous to compare feminism with Nazism - because it somehow trivialises the terrible experiences of the Jews in the Germany of the 1930s.
But making the comparison does not do this at all.
It does the opposite.
It brings to the attention of people the kind of forces that gave rise to Nazism and, as far as men are concerned - particularly the white ones - it makes them understand a little better the horribleness of discrimination and demonisation.
Furthermore, most Jewish groups do not actually highlight the holocaust in order to gain everybody's sympathy.
They do it so that people can LEARN!
They do it so that people can see if something heinous is creeping up on us.
Anyway.
Here are 30 similarities between feminism and 'early' Nazism.
Feminism and Nazism have both ...
discriminated against individuals on the basis of their genetic code.
promoted the view that the targeted group was inferior genetically and behaviourally, e.g. see AH's Men Bear a Striking Resemblance to Slugs. <esmenbearastrikingresemblancetoslugs.htm>
promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being labeled as 'parasites', e.g. see AH's Steven Jones - A Parasite? <esstevenjones.htm>
promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being constantly ridiculed e.g. see Incredible Shrinking Y <http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=FB0F1EFD39590C7A8CDDAE0894DB404482> by Maureen Dowd
promoted propaganda that led to the targeted group being laughed at even when mutilated e.g. Bobbit jokes.
demonised the target group by labeling them as perverts and sexual criminals, e.g. see Put Up or Shut Up <http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,57209,00.html> by Wendy McElroy
sought to break the target group away from their families e.g. see The Federal Bureau of Marriage? <http://www.fathersforlife.org/articles/Baskerville/marriage-expose_1.htm> by Professor Stephen Baskerville.
promoted the view that the targeted group was responsible for most of the major ills in society.
disseminated lies and disinformation about the targeted group in order to further promote their own ideology, e.g. see Msinformation <tgMsinformation.htm> by Professor Christina Hoff Sommers.
disseminated lies and disinformation about historical matters, e.g. see AH's Did Women Really Want To Go Out To Work? <esDidWomenReallyWantToGoOutToWork.htm>
used intimidation, threats and coercion to prevent their opponents from speaking out e.g. see AH's Feminists are nasty things <esFeministsarenastythings.htm>.
promoted the lie that the privileged group consisted of innocent 'victims' of the targeted group e.g. "women have been oppressed throughout history."
demanded special privileges in the workplace for members of the privileged group e.g. preferential job placements for women.
discriminated against the targeted group in educational matters and in the workplace e.g. see AH's Well Done the Girls? <esWellDonetheGirls.htm>
perverted the justice system so that members of the targeted group were easily discriminated against in the law e.g. in family courts.
arranged matters so that accusers from the privileged group could be shielded by anonymity in the courtroom e.g. in sex-assault cases.
arranged matters so that defendants from the targeted group had to 'prove' their innocence e.g. in sex-assault and domestic violence cases.
arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define what, legally, was to be deemed 'a crime', e.g. where nowadays the 'feelings' of women rather than the behaviours of men are the determinants of what constitutes 'a crime' e.g. see The Real Goal Of Feminism <tgTheRealGoalOfFeminism.htm> by Antonia Feitz - 18 min.
arranged matters so that members of the privileged group could capriciously define how the law was to view certain matters e.g. a fetus inside a woman can now be deemed by her - at her whim - to be a worthless piece of tissue or a prospective baby - with all the ramifications of this - regardless of how the father might feel about it all e.g. see AH's Rant Against the Child Support Agency <esRantAgainsttheCSA.htm>. (Also sexual harassment etc.)
arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group more severely than members of the privileged group for the very same crime e.g. in domestic violence and murder cases.
arranged matters so that members of the targeted group were made responsible for the choices and behaviours of members of the privileged group e.g. in paternity fraud cases where duped fathers still have to pay child support.
arranged matters so that members of the privileged group who harmed, or even murdered, members of the targeted group were shown undue leniency - and were often actually applauded for their actions, e.g. see Killer given domestic violence award <http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1651234.stm> and AH's Loose Women <meLooseWomen.htm>.
arranged matters so that the law punished members of the targeted group severely for even trivial offences - e.g. domestic violence, sexual harassment.
arranged matters so that members of the privileged group earned a right to the property of members of the targeted group for no other reason than that they were members of the privileged group e.g. alimony, child custody.
arranged matters so that certain speech or attitudes directed against the privileged group were criminalised e.g. biased 'hate speech' laws.
demanded subservience to the prevailing ideology and to the government.
effectively controlled the mainstream media and the academic institutions and arranged for them to present a dishonest and dishonourable point of view in support of their ideology.
consistently highlighted and exaggerated the achievements and the suffering of the privileged group while downplaying the achievements and the suffering of the targeted group e.g. see Human Rights are not for Men <tgHumanRightsarenotforMen.htm> by Melanie Phillips.
ran government-funded educational courses in universities (e.g. Women's Studies, Title IX) and in schools to promote the privileged group at the expense of the targeted group.
persisted in a long term campaign of hatred toward the targeted group, e.g. "Women need men like a fish needs a bicycle." "Men think about sex every 15 seconds." etc. Also see AH's Permanent Menstrual Tension <esPermanentMenstrualTension.htm>.
Bar the heavy violence and the gas chambers - which came towards the end of the Nazis hold on power - feminism and early Nazism are surely very similar indeed!
But, SuperEric (as normal) hits the proverbial feminazi PIG on the head:
Feminazi is a term to describe a select group of women. Not all women. Not feminists. It describes militant type feminists that use the doctrines and dogmas of Marxism/communism, believes in the eradication of the family unit and more specifically, men, to believe a female over a male when encountering law enforcement & courts and to put women in a group that is "more equal." They use the techniques culled from the Nazi ideology to accomplish their goals.
Another thing that is not often mentioned is:
Hitler said in "Mein Kampf" that if you tell a lie for the purpose of propaganda, tell a big one! Because the bigger the lie is, the more people are apt to believe it, because they can't believe you would dare to tell such a big lie unless it was the truth!
--------------------
Crap Stinks
(just like the feminazis do...do...)
Post Extras:
FreedomFlghter
newbie
Reged: 08/17/07
Posts: 30
Re: Feminazi is merely a "term" to describe [Re: CrapStinks]
#364562 - 02/21/08 06:58 PM Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Am I a bad American??
?
?
?
?
YES, I'M A BAD AMERICA N
?
By: George Carlin
?
I Am Your Worst Nightmare.
?I am a BAD American.
?I am George Carlin.
?
I believe the money I make belongs to me and my family, not some mid level governmental functionary be it Democratic or Republican!
?
I'm in touch with my feelings and I like it that way!
?
I think being a minority does not make you noble or victimized, and does not entitle you to anything.
?
I believe that if you are selling me a Big Mac, do it in English.
?
I believe everyone has a right to pray to his or her God when and where they want to.
?
My heroes are John Wayne, Babe Ruth, Roy Rogers, and whoever canceled Jerry Springer.
?
I don't hate the rich.
I don't pity the poor.
?
I know wrestling is fake and I don't waste my time watching or arguing about it.
?
I've never owned a slave, or was a slave, I haven't burned any witches or been persecuted by the Turks and neither have you!
So, shut up already.
?
I believe if you don't like the way things are here, go back to where you came from and change your own country!
?
This is AMERICA.
?
I want to know which church is it exactly where the Reverend Jesse Jackson preaches, where he gets his money, and why he is always part of the problem and not the solution.
Can I get an AMEN on that one?
?
I think the cops have every right to shoot your sorry rear if you're running from them..
?
I also think they have the right to pull you over if you're breaking the law, regardless of what color you are.
?
..and, no, I don't mind having my face shown on my drivers license. I think it's good..... And I'm proud that 'God' is written on my money.
?
I think if you are too stupid to know how a ballot works, I don't want you deciding who should be running the most powerful nation in the world for the next four years.
?
I dislike those people standing in the intersections trying to sell me stuff or trying to guilt me into making 'donations' to their cause.
?
I believe that it doesn't take a village to raise a child, it takes two parents.
?
..and what is going on with gas prices... Again?
?
I believe 'illegal' is illegal no matter what the lawyers think.
?
I believe the American flag should be the only one allowed in AMERICA!
?
If this makes me a BAD American, then yes, I'm a BAD American.
?
If you are a BAD American too, please forward this to everyone you know.
?
We want our country back!
?
?
?
We NEED GOD BACK IN OUR COUNTRY!
?
?
??????????????? GOD BLESS AMERICA
|
|
0 registered and 1 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
Moderator: dsAdmin
Print Topic
|
Forum Permissions
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is disabled
UBBCode is disabled
|
Rating:
Topic views: 4942
|
|
|
|
|
|
UBB.threads™ 6.5.1.1
|
Easily Connect With a Lawyer or Mediator
Have Divorce Professionals from Your Area Contact You!
|
|
|
|
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
