preemiemom
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/17/07
Posts: 19391
|
|
Umm... no, not "superior". And not sure where exactly I referenced YOU Melody.
I have an issue with people using child support as a means to alienate their children from their fathers (or mothers if non custodial).
I have an issue with people waiving child support solely to get what they want, and then turning around and going after the other party for it.
The debate at hand is between me and RWS and her contention that I'VE gone through the court to stick it to my ex. Which I have NOT. I've never even BEEN to court, other than to file my divorce paperwork. Oh sorry, and one more time to correct things in the paperwork that b/c of the Self Support Reserve issue required specific wording that took a few phone calls and figuring out what it SHOULD be (the clerks didn't even know) but it had to be corrected.
I've NEVER been before a judge, I've never filed contempt. But RWS suggested I'd had a "review" through the court. That is patently.. FALSE. As usual.
However, if you want to continue to have a debate with me that has NOTHING to do with you, feel free. Not sure where YOU get off assuming comments directed directly towards someone else were about YOU.
|
RJ1
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/19/05
Posts: 5164
|
|
Nothing whatsoever wrong with it. But JL says she had nothing to do with this when she had EVERYTHING to do with this. I'm just correcting the people who think JL was clueless about this contempt case.
RJ
|
preemiemom
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/17/07
Posts: 19391
|
|
[quote]What is wrong with Jennylynn contacting CSE and asking them to do something about the child support issues? Isn't that their job???? [/quote]
She claims they SELF initiated THIS review. They did NOT. SHE initiated, as she did the one LAST year. but she's sitting here, lying, saying she didn't. RJ1 is dead on the money in terms of recollecting the sequence of events. Down to the frustration over not being able to REACH CSE to report his violation.
|
RJ1
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/19/05
Posts: 5164
|
|
Right about the time she was ready to cut off ties with ex and have her new bf take his place...actually WANTING ex to just walk away with her having sole and no CS.
RJ
|
preemiemom
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/17/07
Posts: 19391
|
|
[quote]Right about the time she was ready to cut off ties with ex and have her new bf take his place...actually WANTING ex to just walk away with her having sole and no CS.
RJ [/quote]
Bingo! Something along the lines of "I'm perfectly okay with him not paying child support.. if he would reflect that in change of custody and that he wouldn't see him". Not an exact quote of course.
You are, absolutely, 1000% correct in what your last posts have said in terms of recollection.
It is my f/irm belief that she will continually push and press the CS issue until the man DOES finally decide to walk away, and out of the child's life. I don't think she'll truly be happy until she makes that happen.
But she will continually make it look like she's an innocent victim, just swept up in a process she has no, and has exerted any, control over. Which is a flat out, baldfaced, lie. THAT is my issue.
|
Melody
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 10102
Loc: California
|
|
before I can say you sound like you have a superior attitude than anyone else? Doesn't that SMACK of your lofty beliefs of yourself? Jeez!
Well...since you have such specific views on child support, I'm surprised that you would make statements that would insult such a large number of people. So you're ONLY against the people that use child support to alienate fathers. So, then MOST people who get child support, and/or use the system to get support or adjust is are fine, right? And you don't like people who waive support in order to get what they want....and then go after it? How about turning that one about to not liking people who will sell their children in order to get OUT of child support....cuz that's basically what Runs' ex did. Runs saw an opportunity to get the child away from such an unhealthy situation and did so. Just because her ex is stupid enough to think he can walk away from his financial obligation, why should he be allowed to?
And for the record, ANYONE who wants to join in the conversation is entitled to do so....AND I don't have to have you insult me personally to gain an opinion about your attitude, dear. I never said I assumed your comments were about ME....I merely have an opinion about your comments.
|
Melody
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 10102
Loc: California
|
|
isn't the person who didn't pay their support in the first place actually the party responsible for the predicament?
|
Melody
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/04
Posts: 10102
Loc: California
|
|
The guy obviously didn't pay his support....so who cares who initiated anything? If he had paid his support he wouldn't be in this mess.
|
RJ1
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/19/05
Posts: 5164
|
|
That's not my point. But sure...he is in contempt as I've said all along. But I wish she would quit saying she had nothing to do with this. The innocent victim game is getting old. Why not 'fess up??? I would and wouldn't be ashamed of it!
RJ
|
preemiemom
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 01/17/07
Posts: 19391
|
|
I never said her ex was any better than she was. Happy?
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
