ChrisEmbry
journeyman
Reged: 06/21/08
Posts: 57
|
|
Well yesterday my wife sister went to her aunt house to get her mail.And to take photo for her family album.Will yesterday i get a call from her to tell me about the fight she had with liz embry.And how i am going to be blame for sending her over there to do this.I have no idea this was going on and she said that the mother of our 2 kids was calling me a [censored] in front of the kids and all.So somehow the police was called and the cops called me and i ask them what is going to be done about my wife placing her hands on OUR son face.The police Dept stated that she was in her rights to do this.Cause she was protecting her kids.Cause her sister was taken A PIC without her permission.And that THERE IS NOTHING I CAN DO CAUSE I WAS NOT THERE AND THAT I AM WASTING THE POLICE TIME.I was then told that the Temp RO is expire and if that she wanted to she can get another one and say that i am using the Police as 3rd party person to harass her and the kids.Which i think it is crock of bull crap.
PLEASE PASS THIS story around PIC OF MY WIFE RUNNING TO HIT HER SISTER WITH OUR SON IN THE BACKGROUND
HER GRABBING MY SON BY THE FACE TO STOP HIS AUNT FROM TAKING A PIC OF HIM
Edited by ChrisEmbry (07/02/09 01:26 AM)
|
DeeCan
veteran
Reged: 04/05/08
Posts: 1266
|
|
If someone was taking a pic of my kid and I didn't want them to, I probably would have reacted the same way.
She WAS well within her rights. As you would have been if the situation had been reversed.
The very fact that you are posting her full name along with photos of, not so much, but a MINOR child WOULD be grounds to get a TRO.
I hope she does...and has it applied to this type of bullshyt too.
--------------------
Don't drink and park, accidents cause people.
|
ChrisEmbry
journeyman
Reged: 06/21/08
Posts: 57
|
|
Quote:
If someone was taking a pic of my kid and I didn't want them to, I probably would have reacted the same way.
She WAS well within her rights. As you would have been if the situation had been reversed.
The very fact that you are posting her full name along with photos of, not so much, but a MINOR child WOULD be grounds to get a TRO.
I hope she does...and has it applied to this type of bullshyt too.
Now to shot down the stupid reply u gave me.
Quote:
If someone was taking a pic of my kid and I didn't want them to,I probably would have reacted the same way.
Well how do u claim to say "My kid".I mean i assume u was well aware of that it takes a man and a woman create your child.I mean last time i look around at children these days.I have not seen a single name tag that says CHRIS KIDS ARE DEE MAN Kids.I mean i was always taught that they are momma and daddy kids.
Were do claim that you as parent can come up with the right to label a child as mine are hers?
Quote:
She WAS well within her rights. As you would have been if the situation had been reversed
No I would have never threw a temper tantrum when it come to family member to taking photo's.I mean we all grew up with family members taking photo's.Plus with digital cameras being own by almost every America.I do not see your issue.I mean i would have a issue with some sort of stranger taking pic of OUR kids.Secondly i would ever place my hands on OUR any child face to stop someone from taking a picture .I mean anyone that who is in that position.Can choose different ways to handle the issue.You can stand the way of the person and all.Are u can be adult and let the childish games stop.I mean come on for you to claim that she was well within her right's to pull are even place her hands on OUR kids face and then pull them away from someone taken a pic ofOUR KIDS .To me clearly shows what a person u are.As for your clear agreement for her running with a closed fist to attack a another adult while OUR son is watching is clearly the most stupid move to pull ever as a parent when u are trying to get a divorce and then the person has a camera.I mean as A PARENT we should all be subject to keeping OUR child from seeing violence at that young age.I mean they are going to see it and will have to learn all about it as they grow up.But for a wife to claim that attacking her own sister in What u CLEARLY call self defense. is OK.That Is wrong and no child should be A subject to see that.I mean she is a 27 yr old woman and if she was pissed off cause her sister took a photo.She should have choose a different way to handle it.I mean like many people have told u and told me this old saying.
Resorting 2 Violence DOES NOT SOLVE ANYTHING
To me your reply clearly Show's the one sided mind of the person u are.And how u are clearly cannot see the openness of the question that i was trying to ask this forum.
Let me ask u a question.
Would u mind if u mom are your sister are any family member came over to take photos of u and your kids.Would u flip out and start cussing and called the other parent.Vulgar are names that a child should not be hearing.So say if She/HE came over and started taking photo of U AND UR EX(NOTICE HOW I ADD THAT IT TAKES @ least 2 parents to make a child) and add them to her family photo album without you flipping out?I mean would u place your hand on your child face to stop a pic being taking of YOUR kids.Are would u choose a different way to stop it?
Quote:
The very fact that you are posting her full name along with photos of, not so much, but a MINOR child WOULD be grounds to get a TRO.
I hope she does...and has it applied to this type of bullshyt too.
I mean were do u get posting a pic of them contest to the ground of A TPO being order.Well i assume u lost the whole meaning of what a picture mean.If so i was told that THAT A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS.I added the pic to show the horror of the issue that happen and the nature of A PARENT who clearly has anger issue and does not stop and think about her actions before she does them.To me that is a clear case of what u would called a impulsive
Some her is some examples of impulsive behaviors include:
* Going on spending sprees
* Driving recklessly
* Promiscuous sex
* Binge eating
* Yelling, shouting, or screaming at others
* Threatening to harm others
* Destroying property
* Shoplifting
* Getting in physical fights with people
Now i can see u might be a person who could be dealing with someway with this same issue.I mean but then again i have not judge u like u have judge me.My reason for the post was to ask the member of this site about the dangerous position my kids are in and how the police said they she was in her rights to do what she did.Not hear the rantings of a person who clearly is not in touch with the parent inside that we all was born with.
Also if u notice i highlighted the word ours,As a way 2 show u that the my word u use.Is not something i believe in when u have children involved
|
javajunkiee
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/01/08
Posts: 3154
Loc: SC
|
|
Whatever kind of nutjob you say your wife is it doesn't negate the fact that YOU are the one who is now putting your kids in harms way.
NEVER, EVER post the real names of anyone that could be used to track down your children! There are freaks out here that HAVE stalked people before. Real names have been found, homes and families have been found, posters bosses have been found, and all kinds of hell has been visited on not just the poster but their families as well.
You are angry that your wife apparently went off the chain and has harmed your child; how would you feel if some freak followed your links and searched the net and found the home where your kids live?
--------------------
Marriage doesn't come with a money-back guarantee.
|
ChrisEmbry
journeyman
Reged: 06/21/08
Posts: 57
|
|
Once again i see no reads the message,All they are focusing on her name.Also what is going to take that the issue is her placing HER hands on OUR SON,And what do u all think of what the cops said.I mean can we as adult once take the time to answer the question and not focus on the damn name
|
rocketgirl
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/24/04
Posts: 8562
Loc: On the beach in 14 years...
|
|
Who wants to read a post full of typo's and looks like a text message? You are wrong to put people's names and your kids' pictures up on an anon forum board.. plain and simple. What did you hope to accomplish by doing that?
--------------------
Lisa
Diplomacy - the art of telling someone to go to hell, and them looking forward to the trip.
|
Debi
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/03/05
Posts: 7135
|
|
You'd probably get better responses if came off as a person who can at least type a full sentence that actually makes sense without spelling issues. No one will take you seriously.
Obviously you don't care about your son too much or you'd have taken the warnings seriously that people gave you THE LAST TIME when you posted your wife's full name and address. You've pointedout that people seem focused on that, well maybe that would be because some psycho can now find YOUR SON, you moron!
As for the pictures, they are meaningless. Your x wife doesn't look upset in the picture of her running and your son looks like he's laughing in the background. As for the second one, she isn't grabbing his face she has her hand over it and being that nothing but her hand is in the picture no one can tell what frame of mind she was in. Her sister was pretty close to take that picture so she couldn't have been too scared. I've had pictures like that turn up on my own camera when people are goofing around. You have nothing.
--------------------
When we were together, you said you'd die for me. Now, I think it's time you kept your promise.
|
javajunkiee
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/01/08
Posts: 3154
Loc: SC
|
|
I did READ what you say the issue is, but that issue to me is MINOR compared to the danger of posting that name on an internet full of freaks. I understand you're pissed at the childs mother, and it sound like you certainly have cause to be, but Back the hell off of ME.
I was under the mistaken impression from your post that you were concerned for your childs safety more than you were interested in punishing your crazy wife, and simply pointed out posting the name is dangerous. Sheesh -
Bottomline is she CAN place her hands on the son you both created unless there is a COURT ORDER stating she can't, AND you are willing to file contempt charges against her for violating that order. Given that she will likely point to the expired RO with tears in her eyes, state that her *intent* was to shield the child, and the fact that the police didn't find her actions abusive, you will get absolutely nowhere.
So be an adult yourself, process what you're being told, and find another avenue to protect your child.
--------------------
Marriage doesn't come with a money-back guarantee.
|
DeeCan
veteran
Reged: 04/05/08
Posts: 1266
|
|
You're so focused on the "OUR" you can't even complete a freakin' sentence.
You're a control freak. It's very obvious. And now you can't control her. Deal with it!
--------------------
Don't drink and park, accidents cause people.
|
ChrisEmbry
journeyman
Reged: 06/21/08
Posts: 57
|
|
U know for a married woman from McMinnville, Tennessee, USA.You should not be a person who is the one to cast the first stone.
Wow i mean google can find out anything about people these days...
I mean is that true Kim Cantrell,
Kim Cantrell is the publisher of The Mom Trap, a blog dedicated to capturing the moments of motherhood.
She resides with her husband, Brian, and her four children in middle Tennessee.
In addition to writing, Kim enjoys crafting and reading true crime.
Now how can a person such as yourself issue the words that u did.I mean come on.I read your MOM trap blog and all.So were do u have the balls to say control issue in your reply.
Is that cause i CHOOSE two say that me and my ex kids as OUR KIDS.Since it took 2 people to have them and it take 2 to raise them.
But i guess i will stop and read your blog some more and then finish gaggging at the reply u sent
[image]http://z.hubpages.com/u/1204877_177.jpg[/image]
Edited by ChrisEmbry (07/04/09 05:02 PM)
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
