ConcMom
recently joined
Reged: 09/02/04
Posts: 9
Loc: Michigan
|
|
I just have four points. 1) There is no immunity in abortion or leaving your child at a fire house, etc. Although there are no legal ramifications, the moral and emotional wounds are much deeper. 2) When you have sex, you are making a decision - there are consequences to every action and unless you are willing to make the sacrifice, DONT HAVE SEX. 3) These are children you are talking about, not shoes! 4) I have two children who's fathers had no problem deleting themselves from their lives and financial responsiblities. It's not as hard as you think. If you are selfish and uncaring - it is quite easy. Scott, I hope that one day you find happiness and peace. You're bitterness hurts no one but yourself. Merry Christmas.
|
clydetheboosmom
recently joined
Reged: 11/09/04
Posts: 19
Loc: Northeast USA
|
|
Wow...what has the world come to? Another example of a someone not getting it....
If Scott follows the legal system as closely as he claims to, he would understand that the legal systems are cycles - women used to have to be killed in order for domestic violence to be taken seriously, and now you can break a nail and get a RO - this is beginning to balance out.
Lots of things are unfair in life - people have children they don't want, they skip out on child support, they have abortions.....the reason men feel that women have all the options, is simply a biological issue - women have to be pregnant, women have to go through labor, and women have the ability to feed the child through breast milk.....this is not negotiable - men can't do it. Do I agree that there are women who do not handle this responsibility well? Sure. And there are men out there crying over not seeing their kids, and women who are treating them badly......but look at the statistics, and look at the cycles of legality - then come talk to me. The cycle will even out....and then it will sway back to women being beaten within an inch of their lives before someone takes it seriously - I wonder if Scott will be around then to complain about the unfairness to women?
As far as Laci Rocha Petersen - may she and Connor rest in peace - KILLING is never an "option" to avoid a financial responsibility - do people do it? Yes. Is it an option? Never. And how does Scott know what Laci's options would have been should Scott have divorced her? She had family, friends, an education and maybe she would have not wanted Scott around at all? I guess we'll never know, huh? Because Scott did what all sociopaths do....he only thought of himself.
Sound familiar, Scott?
|
almostheaven
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/13/04
Posts: 10468
Loc: West Virginia
|
|
That men used to OWN their children and always got custody. So it would appear that the pendulum has already swung.
--------------------
Char Fox
|
Diane67
enthusiast
Reged: 08/14/04
Posts: 341
Loc: California
|
|
Did he post this just to get us all stirred up?
|
almostheaven
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 07/13/04
Posts: 10468
Loc: West Virginia
|
|
.
--------------------
Char Fox
|
sugarb
enthusiast
Reged: 12/16/04
Posts: 375
Loc: In the Heartland on America
|
|
I didn't know they allowed internet access in jail, Scott Peterson. How'd you manage that?
FYI: From what I've heard, Scott P. has his own fan club and website. Is that where you were intending to post this?
Edited by sugarb (12/17/04 11:43 AM)
|
sugarb
enthusiast
Reged: 12/16/04
Posts: 375
Loc: In the Heartland on America
|
|
One other thing: If murder is what you call an "alternative", I fear for your children and your ex wife, Scott. I pray and fear for them.
|
MominNJ
newbie
Reged: 12/14/04
Posts: 47
Loc: NJ
|
|
Scott,
the only reason nowadays that anyone loses custody of their children is because for one reason or another, they deserve it. (I have yet to see a case where a judge took away a parents rights for NOTHING) And the way it is with custody matters, even if the father murders his wife, he is still has a right to see his children. So, reading between the lines, let me guess, you just figured out that you can't use the kids as a tax exemption this year? Wifey got the wages garnished, has she? saying that Lacey Peterson and her BABY are dead because her husband had no alternative is NUTS. Isn't kind of backwards to be crying about your parental rights and then condoning the murder of a child by it's father? What you say scares me. I still haven't figured out why you posted it here.
--------------------
There are two things you must give your children...The first is ROOTS the second is WINGS
|
landolakes
recently joined
Reged: 12/21/04
Posts: 2
|
|
hello, i'm new here, but just wanted to share with you why it is not always fair to the mother, my son's father for the last couple of weeks has been keeping my son away from me because he found out that i am getting married, he even called me last week and joked about if i had sex with him i could see my son anytime i wanted, i didn't think this was funny, he is using my son as a weapon, my son is a human being, not a weapon, i've contacted my lawyer to continue my custody case, he filed for custody in august and dropped it because we thought we could work things, until he saw my ring. Do courts recognize when fathers (or mothers do this), my son constantly talks about his fathers lady friend,why cant i have a life. I see my lawyer next week, i'm going for full custody, so that my son doesn't have his mom taken away, he is only 6.
|
sparky
enthusiast
Reged: 11/16/04
Posts: 289
|
|
I am filing for sole physical and legal custody. I must allow ex to have visitation.
Do not go to court and totally bad mouth your ex.
Be the bigger parent and offer a good plan for visitation and child raising.
If you are angry and try to keep the other parent away, that goes against you.
Be calm and practical and do what is best for your son.
Every site I have researched states the parent who tries to keep good relationships with the other and of course provides the better environment is the parent the courts prefer.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
