1966Gal
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 04/04/08
Posts: 10098
|
|
your honor, we oppose this request for
partial distribution, however, my client would authorize a partial distribution if Mr Smith would double his withdrawal and give my client half the funds to fix her car"
++++++++
But that makes total sense. You are asking to make a withdraw of a joint marital asset. If you get money out of it, so does she. That's how divorces work. That money belongs to both of you, and if you want to touch it, then she gets to touch it too.
I realize this is new to you and it's very perplexing at first. In your head, split everything down the middle. What you take out of joint assets, she also gets to take out of assets.
She also has NO access to any money, so she can't get her car fixed. What is she supposed to do. She also doesn't have that money laying around in a drawer. During this time, whatever you get, she gets.
Sounds like she has a good lawyer. Make the distribution and get yourself a good lawyer too.
--------------------
The Gov cannot give anything to anyone - that they have not first taken away from someone else.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30378
|
|
Most restraining orders issued at the beginning of the divorce allow for withdrawal of JOINT funds for the use of retaining legal representation. NOT to fix her CAR.
And how do you know how much of the 401K she will get? What if he started it BEFORE he met her? Oh, and she is getting FREE legal services, cause she was declared INDIGENT.
But, in SUSAN WORLD, she has tits, so she is right.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
hanzblinx
enthusiast
Reged: 08/13/10
Posts: 380
|
|
It's pretty clear that the court puts women over children.
For example, an 18 year old teenager with no assets or career or college education will be denied child support in court.
Now take a 30 year old woman. She will get it all, although she is no more indigent than the teenager who gets the shaft. She is also no more indigent than when she entered the marriage.
Men need to understand the parasitic nature of women BEFORE getting married, once married they have the golden ticket that is denied to kids just out of high school.
It's not indigent, it's lack of motivation. Free money is easier to get than a job and women crave free money more than anything.
Edited by hanzblinx (10/14/10 11:21 AM)
|
Sherron
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/25/06
Posts: 20191
|
|
"For example, an 18 year old teenager with no assets or career or college education will be denied child support in court.
Now take a 30 year old woman. She will get it all, although she is no more indigent than the teenager who gets the shaft. She is also no more indigent than when she entered the marriage."
Child support has nothing to do with being indigent.
|
hanzblinx
enthusiast
Reged: 08/13/10
Posts: 380
|
|
[quote]
Child support has nothing to do with being indigent. [/quote]
Without parental support all children are indigent. How many school kids bring in 23K/year? If it were commonplace for children to have productive careers in childhood, child support would not exist.
The difference is children are children and women are adults that want to be treated like children and sadly have priority over children in court. The order of rights in court is
Women>animals>children>men
for example killing an eagle egg will land you in prison but not aborting a fetus. An eagle egg is exactly the same thing, but not human.
|
Sherron
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/25/06
Posts: 20191
|
|
"Without parental support all children are indigent. "
Let me rephrase then... child support has nothing to do with the HOUSEHOLD being indigent.
|
hanzblinx
enthusiast
Reged: 08/13/10
Posts: 380
|
|
[quote]"Without parental support all children are indigent. "
Let me rephrase then... child support has nothing to do with the HOUSEHOLD being indigent. [/quote]
The bias is that courts treat women better than children because given an 18 year old child and a 30 year old woman with the same financial situation the court will give money to the woman because SS has no age limit and CS does.
Therefore they should not have the right to vote because the court sees them as LESS capable than children and children cant vote.
|
DedicatedDad
veteran
Reged: 09/05/04
Posts: 1318
|
|
Actually, at least in my state, a 30 year old woman and 18 year old would be treated exactly the same. If they are indigent, they either get a job or live on the street. However, a 30 year old that a CP of a child is completely different. In my state, all forms of state support and mandatory support from another parent (except alimony) is 100% dependent on being a CP to a child.
|
yngwies_guitar
journeyman
Reged: 01/11/10
Posts: 61
|
|
Dude, get a competent attorney ASAP. You are getting royally screwed.
Borrow the money if you have to. I had to borrow the money from a friend for the retainer for my divorce. It was well worth it.
This isn't like small claims court. Divorce law is complicated. You need an expert.
|
Miranda
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/05
Posts: 20822
Loc: North of Mexico
|
|
Dang where was I when the judge was giving out those verdicts...oh yeah I was too busy working being a single parent not getting CS and paying 100% of the marital debt. That's right....
--------------------
13.1...because I am only half crazy!
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
