english7
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/27/09
Posts: 3001
|
|
"She requested temp alimony , the judge denied her request due to the SSCRA , she is NOW asking for the temp alimony that MAY have been awarded THEN ."
Correct. We do not know how much would have been awarded. My lawyer told me I should have been receiving between 1-2K a month. He said that's usually what his clients get for temp orders with a similar set of incomes.
">>>>>>> This board is an extremely small subset of reality"
That is so very true.
|
Redlegg
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/05/06
Posts: 26677
|
|
Red....got it, but E7's ex DID NOT stop the divorce/legal procedings when she left him when he was active duty.....he did it a year later when he was being deployed. Those are just the facts of her story as she has told them.
I agree, and I would have done the exact same thing, if I could not be there speak on my own behalf(SCRA). What makes no sense is the length of the marriage...
3 yrs, 7 months.
How smart is the guy who, having already been ordered through the air force to pay support, delays it for 30 plus months. He had to know it was going to cost more... The only thing I have said all along is that I can understand where the numbers came from. It is not solely alimony, she did work during the marriage, they both contributed, and they will both come out with probably less than they had.
I do not think any spousal support should be awarded past the divorce, but I certainly could understand why a judge would order it on the past 40+ months.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30195
|
|
Now now, english, haven't you been here long enough to know that not only am I NOT paranoid about people "agreeing" with me, I really don't care WHAT people think about me.
You were married 13 months, you are asking for $35,000 in alimony, that is $2692 for each month you were married. So, almost $3000 a month for each month you were married.
"You lose respect for a long-time poster b/c she disagrees with you?"
No, because of her stance on this situation an alimony.
"You bully people who challenge you and think a few posters in here are taking over the board from you, and you want everyone to gang together and TAKE IT BACK."
I have bullied NO ONE, and I am the LAST person anyone would rally behind. Tell ya the truth, if ANYONE is paranoid, its YOU, LOL.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30195
|
|
That is the TOTAL time, including the 13 month marriage. He was deployed for five years, during which he had to pay the HOUSE payment, as well as any OTHER bills. Plus he was paying her $300 a month. The reason she thinks she should get MORE money (like close to $3000 a month while he was deployed) is because she was, apparently, SO afraid of him, that she couldn't live in the marital residence while he was DEPLOYED TO IRAQ. Sorry, not buying it. He PROVIDED a place to live, she chose to live back in New York, and now wants to PROFIT from it. Its disgusting.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
Redlegg
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/05/06
Posts: 26677
|
|
He was deployed for five years,
I did not know he was deployed for 5 years.....
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30195
|
|
Sorry, typo, my bad, TWO years...
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
english7
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/27/09
Posts: 3001
|
|
"That is the TOTAL time, including the 13 month marriage. He was deployed for five years, during which he had to pay the HOUSE payment, as well as any OTHER bills. Plus he was paying her $300 a month. The reason she thinks she should get MORE money (like close to $3000 a month while he was deployed) is because she was, apparently, SO afraid of him, that she couldn't live in the marital residence while he was DEPLOYED TO IRAQ. Sorry, not buying it. He PROVIDED a place to live, she chose to live back in New York, and now wants to PROFIT from it. Its disgusting."
You are making stuff up again. He was not deployed for five years. Do you just make up things to fit your "reality"?
I couldn't live in the marital residence b/c he wouldn't let me! He changed the locks and the security code. He lived there for several months before he deployed with his girlfriend. Once he was deployed, my lawyer told me I could move down there and use his vehicles. I had begun working up in NY and finally got myself an apartment, so that wasn't feasible. Nor did I think it fair to him.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30195
|
|
It was a typo, I already said that.
"Once he was deployed, my lawyer told me I could move down there and use his vehicles. I had begun working up in NY and finally got myself an apartment, so that wasn't feasible. Nor did I think it fair to him."
Oh, so you thought it was "fairer" to let the house sit empty, and sue him for alimony later, huh? Yeah, your are SUCH a humanitarian.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
english7
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/27/09
Posts: 3001
|
|
The house did not sit empty. Sorry your imagination is incorrect again. His girlfriend lived there for awhile, then he rented it to someone else. He hired a property manager to handle things and to make sure I did not come around his property.
|
Redlegg
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 10/05/06
Posts: 26677
|
|
Ok, two years, so anywhere from 12-24 months out of 40 plus months. minus the 12 for the waiting period, I mean what was the guy thinking....He could have gotten a temporary order of support, which would have ended all the suspense about what was fair in the interim. I am not even talking about what anyone should be awarded, or have to pay, only where the numbers are coming from.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
