gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30210
|
|
">>>>>>>>>> Nonfunctional ones that had been BURIED for 10 years ."
So he DID have SOME...just old ones...but isn't, mathematically, at least, "some" greater than "none"?
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
googledad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/31/05
Posts: 10207
|
|
So why would they think a guy who worked FOR Saddam would be telling the truth?
>>>>>>>>> Because HE WAS . The OTHER guy was lying . They ever ask the guy to take a lie detector test ? Herman Cain's PI woulda been all over that . Hell MAURY could have done a better job .
Whether he HAD them or not was only a PORTION of the UN mandate. He was still in violation for TRYING to get them.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trying to get what , imaginary yellowcake uranium ?
Yep, cause Saddam would NEVER EVER EVER be ABLE to get WMD's, right? I mean its not like he HAD them in the PAST and USED them, right? Oh, wait, what was that about the Kurds in 1988?
>>>>>>>>>>>> And North Korea ( who was ignored ) was building a nuke . Nice picture of Rumsfeld and Saddam shaking hands from back then , cuz YA KNOW , he was OUR ALLY then .
--------------------
Careful. We don't want to learn from this.
|
googledad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/31/05
Posts: 10207
|
|
So he DID have SOME...just old ones...but isn't, mathematically, at least, "some" greater than "none"?
>>>>>>>>>>> Imminent danger from nonfunctioning weapons . What was he gonna do , throw them as us ?
--------------------
Careful. We don't want to learn from this.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30210
|
|
">>>>>>>>> Because HE WAS . The OTHER guy was lying . They ever ask the guy to take a lie detector test ? Herman Cain's PI woulda been all over that . Hell MAURY could have done a better job ."
Like I said, bad call, but reasonable, based on the evidence.
">>>>>>>>>>>> Trying to get what , imaginary yellowcake uranium ?"
Oh, so the guy that was telling the truth, Sabri, SAID that Saddam was trying to get WMD's...but we SHOULD have believed him on the subject of HAVING them, but NOT on the subject of getting them? Come on, pick a side and stick with it.
">>>>>>>>>>>> And North Korea ( who was ignored ) was building a nuke . Nice picture of Rumsfeld and Saddam shaking hands from back then , cuz YA KNOW , he was OUR ALLY then ."
No UN mandate about North Korea. And Bin Laden was our ally as well...times change.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
googledad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/31/05
Posts: 10207
|
|
Like I said, bad call, but reasonable, based on the evidence.
>>>>>>>>>> A bad call ? It's criminal incompetance or BLATANT stupidity when it results in HUNDREDS BILLIONS of DOLLARS and 1000s of lives .
Oh, so the guy that was telling the truth, Sabri, SAID that Saddam was trying to get WMD's...but we SHOULD have believed him on the subject of HAVING them, but NOT on the subject of getting them? Come on, pick a side and stick with it.
>>>>>>>>>> He didn't say that , George Tenet DID .
Both the French intelligence service and the CIA paid Sabri hundreds of thousands of dollars (at least $200,000 in the case of the CIA) to give them documents on Saddam’s WMD programs. “The information detailed that Saddam may have wished to have a program, that his engineers had told him they could build a nuclear weapon within two years if they had fissile material, which they didn’t, and that they had no chemical or biological weapons,” one of the former CIA officers told me.
>>>>>>>>>> Want instead of can or did .
No UN mandate about North Korea.
>>>>>>>>> Nor was there one to invade Iraq . Probably why neither Bush nor Cheney will leave the US .
And Bin Laden was our ally as well...times change.
>>>>>>>>>>> Funny about those allies Republicans pick .
--------------------
Careful. We don't want to learn from this.
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
