LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
M5M5 Carpal \'Tunnel **
Reged: 07/29/05 Posts: 11110 Loc: TN Re: Thanks! [Re: cutiepie] #771011 - 12/12/11 11:08 PM Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote Quick Reply Quick Reply
So, what crime is she being charged for?
-------------------- I can't stand Liars. I'm always disappointed when a liar's pants doesn't catch on fire.
Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Email Post M5M5 Carpal \'Tunnel **
Reged: 07/29/05 Posts: 11110 Loc: TN Re: Thanks! [Re: ssmom79] #771013 - 12/12/11 11:10 PM Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote Quick Reply Quick Reply
I feel the same way, ssmom. And I tell ya what, sometimes it drives me plum crazy not knowing who the guilty party is. I mean...we can think and guess all day, but...no one really knows. I have some ideas who it is, but that's all they are. Ideas.
-------------------- I can't stand Liars. I'm always disappointed when a liar's pants doesn't catch on fire.
Post Extras: Print Post Remind Me! Notify Moderator Email Post MrsB Carpal \'Tunnel **
Reged: 07/03/10 Posts: 6115 Re: Thanks! [Re: M5M5] #771017 - 12/12/11 11:23 PM Edit post Edit Reply to this post Reply Reply to this post Quote Quick Reply Quick Reply
I'd love to know too:).
---------------------------------------- So I suppose you could squirrel out of it saying "well there's no CRIME per se" but we all know what was said, and what she said which is right there "I'd love to know too", like she had NO idea what the troll was posting about...
Soooo, did she have no idea and would love to know? Or did she know EXACTLY what it was and played like the troll was lying.. which they weren't, SHE was.
Which is it? Seriously.. Which is it?
|
LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
[quote]SHe has to respond. It is the oddest thing I've ever seen. And I have worked for almost 2 decades with Psych inpatients.
If a person really has all of these problems caused by internet postings, you'd think they'd stop. But, she can't. [/quote]
-----------Ditto your ITA! And I'll see you an AMENNNN!!!
|
Runswithscissors
Carpal \'Tunnel

Reged: 05/29/04
Posts: 13381
|
|
I've stayed away from your mess....I've kept my mouth shut...but I got to say this....without a doubt you have got to be the most stupid individual I have ever seen. Why the hell you still post is beyond me.... You've dragged so many people through hell with acqusations of stalking, obsessions....etc. you seriously need mental help. I can't believe what all I am reading...how do all these people know your life?? Why do you do this to yourself.....dear god, you are an idiot....
Okay, I'm done....carry on
|
M5M5
Carpal \'Tunnel

Reged: 07/29/05
Posts: 11722
|
|
No, I am not denying it now and I still agree with what I said to you before.
I just wasted like an 1.5 hour of good sleep time.
|
M5M5
Carpal \'Tunnel

Reged: 07/29/05
Posts: 11722
|
|
Well...maybe I'm slow or just really really tired...but it looks to me like she said "I'd love to know too" in response to my question/statement about how I would love to know who the guilty party is...meaning, who the trolls are. Since she replied to me right after I said that.
|
LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
Sorry M5, you're wrong. I just double checked to make 100% sure. Her reply was made to your "crime charged with" post. No question. It's right there in the "Thanks!" thread where she announced her ex was contacted.
Soooooo... by your admission above, pretending to not know something you DO know, she DID lie. Correct? It's very simple.
She won't tell the whole truth about the contempt either. It would make her look bad. So she will go along with the assumption it's about withholding visitation from her scumbag ex. Not quite.
|
M5M5
Carpal \'Tunnel

Reged: 07/29/05
Posts: 11722
|
|
Ok, before hitting the sack, just wanted to reply and say I went and checked too, and you are right...she did say that in response to my "what was she charged for" question. Sorry. If one says they know something and one really does know something, yes...that would be a lie.
BTW, I said I just wasted a few hours. I read the court documents...kinda felt compelled to since no one would SPOON FEED it to me (thanks Arden..I now have a headache this big { } ).
|
Runswithscissors
Carpal \'Tunnel

Reged: 05/29/04
Posts: 13381
|
|
I'm so lost....so what is the contempt for? If its not for withholding. Why would she low when so many people have access to her records? None of this or her makes sense. It's a trainwreck.
|
M5M5
Carpal \'Tunnel

Reged: 07/29/05
Posts: 11722
|
|
She has not been found guilty of anything, for the record, that I can see. She was charged with contempt. An arraignment gives an accused person the right to hear the charges for which he or she is being prosecuted. Arraignment is the initial and first appearance before a judge where he reads the official charges against the defendant and he/she enters a plea (in this case Not Guilty). She has not been convicted of anything...she has not been "found in contempt".
|
LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
Thank you M5.
Sorry u wasted hours, unfortunately, it's not her place or mine to potentially sway you with our perception of what's there.
|