Loretta
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/05
Posts: 3940
|
|
[quote]Quite a few have made comments based on jls postings. Going back when all the bulkshyt FIRST started. She said "pm did this this and that" and next thing 15 posters were talking shyt about me. Absolutely. FACT. And it's hysterical. Here YOU are.. AGAIN, questioning it. You know SHYT. That simple. You should base your opinions on your interactions, DIRECTLY WITH ME. As such, u should have no negative opinion of me. Even though you've been a total bytch bc of jl, when you NEEDED something from me? I was nothing but nice and helpful to u. FACT. Just sayin [/quote]
My opinion of you is 100% based on you. As is my opinion of JL and everyone else on here. Sorry if you don't get that. BTW, you accused me of being one of the annon posters, thing is? I don't care. I tried to be friendly with you and as soon as my opinion differed from yours you threw it up in my face. Once bitten (called a tw@t), twice shy. You are very bitter, IMO. That is something I don't get. I've heard from quite a few regarding you, not one has said that accusation affected their opinion of you. In fact, 100% of them don't think you are any of the annon posters.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30199
|
|
What I find interesting about it is that he supposedly lied (NOT "slander", as it was in a printed "media", it would be LIABLE), and was forced to apologize for it.
Now, she filed contempt charges against him and attempted to have his time reduced by charges that were found to be false, as he was not found guilty. So, doesn't that mean that SHE lied as well?
Also, he had BLOCKED her from his facebook, yet she read it by some means anyway. Wouldn't that be a violation of the protective order (they are both under its jurisdiction), if not in FACT, then in the SPIRIT of the protective order?
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
Not bitter at all, Loretta. Funny, for someone "once bitten", you had no problem asking me for HELP with something when it suited your purposes right? Funny how that works :)
|
Miranda
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/05
Posts: 20822
Loc: North of Mexico
|
|
I read the article and found the whole thing ridiculous. Ex spouses vent/bash each other all the time. This judge is a joke and legislating from the bench, I hope he is up for re-election this year. He cannot force free speech from the bench...totally ridiculous and the ex wife needs to get a life. I can't see what joy or satifaction she would get from this. I would hope this decision will be appealed.
If this were the standard my cousin would be under the jail. She is always posting, blogging, calling jobs saying inflamatory lies on her exes (plural).
--------------------
13.1...because I am only half crazy!
Edited by Miranda (02/27/12 08:23 AM)
|
LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
I think people should be wayyyy more controlled what they say on FB. Way out of hand. Just in general, never mind ex rants. I defriended one high school friend. I feel bad if his kid is ever in a position to read how much he despises her mother and the awful things he says about her. I tried to tell him nicely, a few times, how bad it reflects on HIM but didn't have any effect. I literally felt ill reading most of it so I defriended him.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30199
|
|
"I think people should be wayyyy more controlled what they say on FB."
I don't think what people say should EVER be controlled.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
Then they have to be prepared for consequences then, such as in this case. or like my friend, if his kid ends up hating HIM b/c he keeps trashing her mother. There's a consequence.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30199
|
|
"Then they have to be prepared for consequences then, such as in this case."
The consequences in this case were not only wrong, they were unconstitutional. Your "Facebook" page is akin to a private message board in your home. Only people who are INVITED to view your stuff, can view it. As such, it is NOT open to liable or slander accusations, anymore than a NOTEPAD in your kitchen would be open to such scrutiny.
"or like my friend, if his kid ends up hating HIM b/c he keeps trashing her mother. There's a consequence."
Not a LEGAL consequence. And lets be honest, what are the ODDS of some kid looking back 10 or 15 YEARS and finding an old facebook post?
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
LexieBelle
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 11/07/10
Posts: 3680
|
|
Sorry I disagree, facebook is NOT private. Once you invite ONE person to view it? It's NOT PRIVATE. If you want a notebook in your home? THEN USE ONE. I mean the paper and pen version of a notebook, lol, not a laptop, lol..
Seriously.. we have a poster here and even YOU have lambasted her for it, about screaming "privacy violations, privacy violations!!!" when THEY are the ones who have posted/provided information yadda yadda. If you have a FB page and you have ONE friend on it? IT'S NO LONGER PRIVATE!
It's just that simple.
If you want stuff to be PRIVATE? Then don't talk about it PUBLICLY and fb, once you have even ONE person on it? Is no longer private.
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30199
|
|
"Once you invite ONE person to view it? It's NOT PRIVATE."
But if people do not agree with or want to see something I OWN, that I INVITED them to see, that does NOT rise to the level of liabel or slander.
"If you want a notebook in your home? THEN USE ONE. I mean the paper and pen version of a notebook, lol, not a laptop, lol."
DO you really want SOMEONE ELSE deciding what is and isn't "private" in your home?
"Seriously.. we have a poster here and even YOU have lambasted her for it, about screaming "privacy violations, privacy violations!!!" when THEY are the ones who have posted/provided information yadda yadda. If you have a FB page and you have ONE friend on it? IT'S NO LONGER PRIVATE!"
Ah, the HUGE difference being that I am pointing out why people KNOW that information, but NEVER EVER debating whether or not she has the right to POST it.
"If you want stuff to be PRIVATE? Then don't talk about it PUBLICLY and fb, once you have even ONE person on it? Is no longer private."
But you still have the right to say what you wish.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
[Re: 
Edit
Reply
Quote
