matthew
member
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 115
|
|
Went to court March 28th and basically my sons biological mother had EOW but, because she has been absent from his life for 4 years her visitation rights have been suspended 'till the next court hearing in June and her and our son are ordered to have con-joint counseling once a week. My question is: We have a completely seperate issue----Child Support hearing scheduled for tomorrow. The CSE did a calculation based on her and my income and they calculated she should pay 431- a month but that was based on her stating she had him 5% of the time which is absolutely false. She's going to be represented by her attorney tomorrow, what can they say or do to decrease the proposed amount? She's done two income and expense declarations. On the first one she said she only paid 100- a month on living expenses for her daughter, now shes claming on the second one she pays 450- on her daughter who lives with her and the father and shes also claming now shes going to college and paying 200- a month on school and that she has absolutely no excess money going into her savings account when it states on a copy of her paycheck stub she is having 400- a month put into her savings account. We we're both qualified on the CSE calculations for hardship of us both having 1 other child from another relationship. Whats going to take place at this hearing?
|
Relayer
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/13/07
Posts: 9506
Loc: Moorglade Mover
|
|
You truly are a dickhead. You have worked so hard to keep her away from the child, yet want to grab her money. I'd call you a c*nt but a c*nt is useful...
You just Can't Understand Normal Thinking..can you..LOL...figure it out..
--------------------
GO CUBBIES!!!!
|
matthew
member
Reged: 08/23/05
Posts: 115
|
|
I didn't take her rights away...the judge did!!! So, he must be a dick-head too! No-one here is a dick-head but you! You must be a dead-beat father!!! Last time I checked abandoning your child for 4 years isn't okay and every parent should both equally support their children.
|
spinnerdegrassi
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 08/20/06
Posts: 7947
|
|
Why did you marry this woman and have a child with her? How come you chose not to make good choices?
|
gr8Dad
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/07/04
Posts: 30195
|
|
...out of hand. Have you asked the SAME question of the 90% of the WOMEN on this board with POS ex's?
I mean, matt is YOUNG, he HAS made errors, but MOM ran off, and MOM wasn't there, and HE took the reins and did what had to be done.
--------------------
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...
|
Relayer
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/13/07
Posts: 9506
Loc: Moorglade Mover
|
|
[quote]...out of hand. Have you asked the SAME question of the 90% of the WOMEN on this board with POS ex's?
I mean, matt is YOUNG, he HAS made errors, but MOM ran off, and MOM wasn't there, and HE took the reins and did what had to be done. [/quote]
Dad- He has worked hard to deny her parental rights...that is where my problem with him is..and to alienate the kid from the mother..it's just wrong..and then go after even more money..it's wrong..
--------------------
GO CUBBIES!!!!
|
Relayer
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 03/13/07
Posts: 9506
Loc: Moorglade Mover
|
|
Also, once you have a kid and have had custody for 4 years, the "young" excuse is out the window. He is old enough to know better..he's not 18
--------------------
GO CUBBIES!!!!
|
DeeCan
veteran
Reged: 04/05/08
Posts: 1266
|
|
Matthew is the male version of many BMs. HE ran Mom off. Anyone who does that, male or female, doesn't deserve to be a parent. A child needs BOTH parents...not one and a stepparent cloaked as a parent.
Granted, she should have fought harder; but I'm sure she was intimidated like many men are.
Matthew is an a$$. End of story.
--------------------
Don't drink and park, accidents cause people.
|
Buckeye
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 12/08/05
Posts: 7857
|
|
Am I just dreaming or have we been through this supervised visitation thing with Matthew a few weeks ago.
|
cincsu
Carpal \'Tunnel
Reged: 06/02/05
Posts: 4686
Loc: residence in AZ, case in CA
|
|
matthew it doesn't really matter what she says her expenses are. all the times my DH has been to court it didn't matter what the expenses were on either side...just the income.
and regardless of what she puts in her savings account that doesn't mean it stays there. maybe she thought she'd try to save $400 per month and she ends up using that every month to pay rent, etc.
and to everyone else....how do we know that he pushed her out? so many BMs try to do this to the dads - try to limit parenting time, are litigous, etc. etc. and i don't see nearly the bashing on that side of the fence. for some reason it seems to be acceptable for a mother to push out a father but not the other way around. even mention the fact the mother isn't around and he "drove her away" when a father isn't around he's a dead beat that has abandoned the family....the double standards are annoying.
--------------------
wife of 1, mother of 2, stepmother of .3475902453
|
Previous
Index
Next
Threaded
Edit
Reply
Quote
