Quote:

---

Courts in PA have to follow a 3 pronged test to determine whether any relocation is allowable ( form Gruber v. Gruber ) .

[1]the potential advantages of the proposed move and thelikelihood that the move would substantially improve thequality of life for the custodial parent and the children and is not the result of a momentary whim on the part of the custodial parent

---> Just an opinion obviously, but until "fiance" becomes "DH", I don't see how her moving with him is not a "whim". I know she works for the company, but she would need to show there was a promotion (and a big one) in the move for her.

[2]the integrity of the motives of both the custodial and non-custodial parent in either seeking the move or seeking to prevent it; [and]

[3]the availability of realistic, substitute visitation arrangements which will adequately foster an ongoing relationship between the child and the non-custodialparent

--> 800 miles or so is obviously going to make it difficult.

---

Joey, also, Illinois is VERY repressive in terms of custody and CS. If she gets juristiction there evenutally, you are screwed. As an example, there is NO such thing as 60/40 or 50/50 or anything. There is CP and NCP and time is not defined other than "reasonable". Healthcare will fall on you. Not sure how CS works in PA either, but in Illinois, parenting time has no effect on CS, nor does she have an obligation to provide for the child, though one would hope and assume she would.

--------------------
GO CUBBIES!!!!

Post Extras