"The kiddie p0rn was recently discovered on Josh Powells computer taken from his home (that he shared with his wife in Utah). It was an animation depicting incestuous sex between an adult and a child. That is the full info on that. A few days before the most recent CPS hearing the court in Utah agreed to allow Washington to view the evidence. It was after viewing that material the judge (who was most likely going to return the kids prior to this evidence) decided to order a psychosexual evaluation."
I would be more than willing to view what YOU Think states that it was just found. EVERYTHING I have seen said it was found 2 years ago when they seized his computer after his wife's disappearence.
"I am sure he was scared shytless his little private predilection was about to be very public."
As long as he never ACTED on it, he was WELL within the law. Assuming he DID have the desires is a stretch, but the DESIRES are not illegal, and honestly, if you DO have those desires, and fight them successfully, as he appeared to do since there is NO evidence he acted on them, and fight them, I can respect that.
"It is also unfair to say Utah has no evidence against him. All they have said is that they don't have enough."
No, as in this country, we are INNOCENT until PROVEN guilty, it is COMPLETELY fair to say that in the ABSENCE of evidence, there is no evidence. When they decide to RELEASE some evidence, I would reconsider my stance after seeing it, but I am NOT going to change my stance because they MIGHT have some evidence.
"Given that it took a court order to release the kiddie p0rn they found 2 years ago - I'd say they are playing it pretty close to the vest."
Well, FIRST, it wasn't kiddie p0rn, it was animated, we know this as he was not ARRESTED for kiddie p0rn. Second, having an incest related video is NOT an indication that he was a bad parent or a murderer.
"They probably think that her body will turn up eventually and the last thing anyone wants is her body to turn up with conclusive evidence and he was already acquitted."
And UNTIL that occurs, he is INNOCENT, and deserves to be TREATED as though is is innocent of those crimes. That was FAR from occuring. He was being penalized using a system with NO evidence, and a refusal to take it to trial so he COULD prove himself innocent.
They took his children with NO evidence that he was a bad parent.
Why give a "senior" discount, they have had plenty of time to raise the money...