Introduction to Child Relocation Issues
As our society has become increasingly mobile and migratory, the number of relocation cases has continued to expand at an astounding rate. No jurisdiction has escaped the need to address this thorny custody issue and its attendant effects on a child’s relationship with his or her parents. These jurisdictions have recognized the delicate nature of such decisions and have expressed their concern regarding the inherent difficulty in crafting an evenhanded result. The following passage from the New Jersey Supreme Court clearly articulates this concern:
Inevitably, upon objection by a noncustodial parent, there is a clash between the custodial parent’s interest in self-determination and the noncustodial parent’s interest in the companionship of the child. There is rarely an easy answer or even an entirely satisfactory one when a noncustodial parent objects. If the removal is denied, the custodial parent may be embittered by the assault on his or her autonomy. If it is granted, the noncustodial parent may live with the abiding belief that his or her connection to the child has been lost forever. Baures v. Lewis, 167 N.J. 91, 770 A.2d 214, 217 (2001).
The ability of a custodial parent to relocate was last addressed in this publication over eight years ago. See Nadine E. Roddy, Stabilizing Families in a Mobile Society: Recent Case Law on Relocation of the Custodial Parent, 8 Divorce Litigation 141 (August 1996). While the state of relocation law has not dramatically changed in the intervening years, the sheer volume of recent relocation cases warrants the revisiting of this issue. This article will examine recent decisions concerning the relocation of the custodial parent in sole or primary physical custody arrangements as well as the proposed relocation of a parent in cases involving a joint custodial arrangement, including both joint legal custody and joint physical custody. In addition, since this publication last addressed the issue of relocation, there has been a recent trend to apply some type of best-interests-of-the-child standard to resolve relocation disputes. This trend is evident in both recent court decisions as well as state statutes governing a parent’s right to relocate.
Useful Online Tools
Resources & Tools
GOOD FAITH -- In general, courts require that the relocation of a child be made in good faith, which means that the noncustodial parent, in order to oppose relocation, must demonstrate that the move is not in good faith and not in the best interest of the child. Relocating for purposes to just "get away" from the non-custodial parents is not looked fondly upon by the court.
Sponsored by: Mom’s House, Dad’s House
Easily Connect With a Lawyer or Mediator
Have Divorce Professionals from Your Area Contact You!
Online Custody Tracking
Custody JunctionTMallows you to schedule, track and monitor current and future custody, visitation, and support arrangements. You can develop and share a detailed parenting calendar, track all scheduled and non-scheduled parenting events, and generate valuable statistical reports for personal or legal use.
Online Parenting Plans
3StepParentingPlanTM uses cutting-edge online software to create your Parenting Plan. Using a smart question-and-answer application, 3StepParentingPlanTM gets you a fully customized Parenting Plan in a little more than half of a lawyerÕs billable hour.
Interstate Enforcement of Support: A Short Primer on Federal and Uniform Law
Established in 1996
Copyright© 1996-. All rights reserved by MH Sub I, LLC dba 3StepDivorce.