![]()
< Home Page [About Us]
![]()
Why?Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)
Cases of Interest: Commingled Assets
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
PENNSYLVANIA: Verholek v. Verholek, 741 A.2d 792 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1999).
The husband, who originally asserted that certain shares of stock were jointly owned by him and his wife, was estopped from later claiming that they were nonmarital property. The husband was also estopped from claiming that a certain inheritance was nonmarital property, because it had been commingled with marital funds.
Read More About This Case
VIRGINIA: Holden v. Holden, __ Va. App. __, 520 S.E.2d 842 (1999).
The husband adequately retraced funds that came from the sale of separate property but were commingled with marital property.
Read More About This Case
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()