![]()
< Home Page [About Us]
![]()
Why?Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)
Cases of Interest: Criminal Offenses
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
ALASKA: LaParle v. State, 957 P.2d 330 (Alaska Ct. App. 1998).
A lawyer who conspired with his client to conceal and appropriate marital funds during divorce proceedings could be convicted of theft and perjury.
Read More About This Case
ILLINOIS: In re Marriage of Auriemma, ___ Ill. App. 3d ___, 648 N.E.2d 118 (1994).
The trial court abused its discretion by refusing to award attorney's fees for litigation surrounding an illegal wiretap placed in the wife's home.
Read More About This Case
NEW HAMPSHIRE: DeMauro v. DeMauro, ___ N.H. ___, 712 A.2d 623 (1998).
The husband properly asserted the privilege against self-incrimination in response to the wife's questions regarding his finances and business activities during the parties' 20-year marriage, because his answers could be a link in the chain necessary to prosecute him for racketeering offenses.
Read More About This Case
TEXAS: Parker v. Parker, 897 S.W.2d 918 (Tex. Ct. App. 1995).
A husband's electronic eavesdropping on his wife's attorneys constituted outrageous and reprehensible conduct that justified a $1 million punitive damages award.
Read More About This Case
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()