|
|
|
Cases of Interest: Grandparent's Rights
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
ARIZONA: McGovern v. McGovern, No. 2-CA-CV-01-0016 (Ariz. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2001).
The grandparents appealed a judgment denying their request to obtain visitation with their granddaughter. The court held that the Arizona grandparent visitation statute was constitutional, as it had a number of safeguards for the parents.
Read More About This CaseKANSAS: Skov v. Wicker, No. 85,916 (Kan. Oct. 19, 2001).
The application of Kan. Stat. Ann. § 60-1616(b) (Supp. 2000), with no limitations on granting grandparents visitation, violates a parent's fundamental right to custody, care, and control of his or her child under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Read More About This CaseKANSAS: In re Interest of T.A., No. 86,550 (Kan. Ct. App. Dec. 21, 2001).
The appellate court reversed the decision of the trial court granting the paternal grandparents visitation on a schedule other than that offered by the mother. Citing Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000), and Kansas Dep't of SRS v. Paillet, 270 Kan. 646, 16 P.3d 962 (2001).
Read More About This CaseMASSACHUSETTS: Enos v. Correia, 38 Mass. App. Ct. 318, ___ N.E.2d ___ (1995).
IOWA: In re Mitchell, 21 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1314 (Iowa 1995).
Two recent cases have considered the question of standing in grandparent visitation cases. In the first case, the maternal grandmother sought visitation of her granddaughter pursuant to the Massachusetts grandparent visitation statute.
Read More About These CasesMICHIGAN: Heltzel v. Heltzel, No. 97-000316-DM (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 23, 2001).
The mother appealed the award of physical and joint legal custody of her child to her parents, the child's maternal grandparents. The question presented was whether the trial court erroneously assigned to the mother the burden to prove that the child's placement with her was in the child's best interests.
Read More About This CaseMINNESOTA: Olson v. Olson, 534 N.W.2d 547 (Minn. 1995).
The maternal grandparent petitioned the court for visitation with her granddaughter after the custodial mother refused visitation. The court of appeals held that where a grandparent's own child, the parent of the grandchild, objects to visitation, the grandparent has no standing to request visitation.
Read More About This CaseNORTH CAROLINA: Fisher v. Fisher, ___ N.C. App. ___, 477 S.E.2d 251 (1996).
NEW HAMPSHIRE: O'Brien v. O'Brien, ___ N.H. ___, 684 A.2d 1352 (1996).
CONNECTICUT: Castagno v. Wholean, 239 Conn. 336, 684 A.2d 1181, 1191 (1996).
TENNESSEE: McVay v. Blen, 23 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1182 (Tenn. Ct. App. Jan. 13, 1997).
NORTH DAKOTA: Peterson v. Peterson, 23 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1200 (N.D. Feb. 12, 1997).
IOWA: McMain v. Iowa District Court for Polk County, 23 Fam. L. Rep. (BNA) 1219 (Iowa Feb. 19, 1997).
The pendulum continues to swing in the direction of parents' rights and away from grandparents' rights, especially where there is an intact family. Six cases in the last four months demonstrate the courts' renewed interest in protecting parents' fundamental liberty interests over grandparents' asserted visitation rights.
Read More About These CasesGo to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page
| The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. A lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions. |