![]()
< Home Page [About Us]
![]()
Why?Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)
Cases of Interest: Life Insurance
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
GEORGIA: Waggaman v. Franklin Life Insurance Co., ___ Ga. ___, 458 S.E.2d 826 (1995).
The doctrine of res judicata barred the former husband from pursuing an action for a declaratory judgment that he owned an insurance policy on his life, where the parties' divorce decree had awarded that policy to the wife.
Read More About This Case
KENTUCKY: Hughes v. Scholl, 900 S.W.2d 606 (Ky. 1995).
The rights of an insurance policy beneficiary are not affected by the mere fact of a divorce between the beneficiary and the insured.
Read More About This Case
MICHIGAN: Massachusetts Indemnity & Life Insurance Co. v. Thomas, ___ Mich. App. ___, 520 N.W.2d 708 (1994).
Waiver provision in the parties' property settlement agreement meant that the former wife was not entitled to proceeds of a policy insuring the former husband's life, even though she herself had purchased the policy and paid the premiums.
Read More About This Case
NEW JERSEY: In re Santos, 283 N.J. Super. 26, 660 A.2d 1271 (Ch. Div. 1994) (released 1995).
A divorce alone does not impliedly revoke the designation of a former spouse as a beneficiary of a life insurance policy.
Read More About This Case
OKLAHOMA: Bigbie v. Bigbie, 898 P.2d 1271 (Okla. 1995).
The husband's contractual right to future commissions for renewal premiums on life insurance policies was marital property.
Read More About This Case
TENNESSEE: Bell v. Bell, 896 S.W.2d 559 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994).
Since the wife, as beneficiary, had only an expectancy in the husband's term life insurance policy, a temporary injunction generally prohibiting property transfers did not preclude him from changing beneficiaries during the divorce proceedings.
Read More About This Case
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()