Navigation Bar

< Home Page[About Us]

Subsription Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)

Cases of Interest: Premarital Property
National Legal Research Group, Inc.

ALASKA: Harrelson v. Harrelson, 932 P.2d 247 (Alaska 1997).
The trial court erred in finding that the parties were married for eight years, when in fact they were married for only the last three years of their relationship.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

COLORADO: In re Marriage of Renier, 854 P.2d 1382 (Colo. Ct. App. 1993).
Stock shares purchased during marriage with marital funds through options acquired before marriage were marital property. Additional shares husband acquired during marriage were also marital, since he failed to trace those shares to stock split of shares acquired before marriage.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

FLORIDA: Anson v. Anson, 772 So. 2d 52 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000).
Was the husband's capital stock a marital asset, and was a retained earnings bookkeeping method the correct method to determine this?
Subscription Read More About This Case

ILLINOIS: In re Marriage of Smith, ___ Ill. App. 3d ___, 638 N.E.2d 384 (1994).
The husband's self-serving testimony that he transferred his premarital stock into joint title only for convenience and not to make a gift did not overcome the presumption that property held in joint tenancy is marital property.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

INDIANA: Cowden v. Cowden, 661 N.E.2d 894 (Ind. Ct. App. 1996).
Although business assets acquired by the husband before the marriage were part of the marital estate, the premarital origin of the business assets justified awarding him most of the marital estate.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

KENTUCKY: Dotson v. Dotson, 864 S.W.2d 900 (Ky. 1993).
The trial court should not have granted the wife 85% of the marital estate simply because most of the marital property was derived from the nonmarital assets she brought to the marriage.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

MAINE: Simoneau v. Simoneau, 693 A.2d 1135 (Me. 1997).
Property acquired by one party during premarital cohabitation is not marital property subject to equitable distribution.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

NEW JERSEY: Pascale v. Pascale, 274 N.J. Super. 429, 644 A.2d 638 (App. Div. 1994).
By selling her premarital stock and using the proceeds for a down payment on the jointly titled marital home, the wife made an interspousal gift and did not retain a separate ownership interest in the proceeds from the sale of the stock.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

NORTH CAROLINA: Minter v. Minter, 111 N.C. App. 321, 432 S.E.2d 720 (1993).
Although husband failed to show that his separate property was the source of currently owned assets, the trial court was obligated to consider husband's separate property contributions as a distributional factor.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

SOUTH CAROLINA: Murray v. Murray, ___ S.C. ___, 439 S.E.2d 312 (Ct. App. 1993).
Home which husband paid for before the marriage was not transmuted to marital property merely because the parties lived there for the duration of their 17-year marriage.
SubscriptionRead More About This Case

State Home Archives Bulletin Menu Chat Rooms Family Law Links Publications Menu Dictionary