|
|
|
Cases of Interest: Source of Funds
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.
MINNESOTA: Robert v. Zygmunt, 652 N.W.2d 537 (Minn. Ct. App. 2002).
The wife did not contribute to the retained earnings of a Subchapter S corporation merely (1) by being taxed upon corporate income, where there was no showing that marital funds were used to pay the taxes; and (2) by being physically present at board meetings and casting nominal votes on corporate issues, where other persons clearly made all of the key managerial decisions.
Read More About This CaseMISSOURI: Alexander v. Alexander, 956 S.W.2d 957 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).
The trial court's findings were not sufficiently specific to properly apply the "source of funds" formula to classify the increase in value of the marital home.
Read More About This CaseVIRGINIA: Hart v. Hart, 27 Va. App. 46, 497 S.E.2d 496 (1998).
Marital and nonmarital components of hybrid property may be apportioned in the same percentages as their respective contributions to the total equity in the property. The value of improvements, not their cost, should be considered when determining contributions.
Read More About This CaseGo to: Cases of Interest by Category
Go to: Previous Page
| The information contained on this page is not to be considered legal advice. A lawyer should always be consulted in regards to any legal matters. Divorce Source, Inc. is also not a referral service and does not endorse or recommend any third party individuals, companies, and/or services. Divorce Source, Inc. has made no judgment as to the qualifications, expertise or credentials of any participating professionals. Read our Terms & Conditions. |