< Home Page [About Us] Why? Access to some research documents (those we license from independent legal research companies) are restricted to subscribers. To gain access to ALL of these documents, you must subscribe. If you are already a subscriber, you may sign in before you begin your research. (Why Subscribe?)

Cases of Interest: Alabama
© National Legal Research Group, Inc.

Alimony (full category)

ALABAMA: Mosley v. Mosley, 747 So. 2d 894 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999).
The trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding the business to the husband and the business property to the wife where it could have awarded the income-producing property to the former wife in lieu of periodic alimony.
Read More About This Case

Classification (full category)

ALABAMA: James v. James, 764 So. 2d 549 (Ala. Civ. App. 1999).
The couple's antenuptial agreement had been rescinded, the husband's businesses were held to be marital property, and the wife had no interest in the husband's individual retirement account.
Read More About This Case

Contempt (full category)

ALABAMA: Smith v. Smith, 703 So. 2d 418 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997).
The husband could be found in contempt for failing to satisfy an income tax debt as required by the parties' divorce judgment, which incorporated a separation agreement allocating tax liability to the husband.
Read More About This Case

Debts (full category)

ALABAMA: Smith v. Smith, 703 So. 2d 418 (Ala. Civ. App. 1997).
The husband could be found in contempt for failing to satisfy an income tax debt as required by the parties' divorce judgment, which incorporated a separation agreement allocating tax liability to the husband.
Read More About This Case

Division of Property (full category)

ALABAMA: Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 717 So. 2d 422 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998).
It was inequitable to require the wife to make the payments on the marital home for 11 more years and yet award the husband an equal division of the proceeds from the eventual sale of the home.
Read More About This Case

Marital Home (full category)

ALABAMA: Crenshaw v. Crenshaw, 717 So. 2d 422 (Ala. Civ. App. 1998).
It was inequitable to require the wife to make the payments on the marital home for 11 more years and yet award the husband an equal division of the proceeds from the eventual sale of the home.
Read More About This Case